|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH] qemuzephyrrunner.py: add tmpfsdir support
OE-Core rev: fd1c26ab426c3699ffd8082b83d65a84c8eb8bff added an
additional parameter, tmpfsdir, to the API. This caused testimage to no
longer work in meta-zephyr. Add that parameter and everything
OE-Core rev: fd1c26ab426c3699ffd8082b83d65a84c8eb8bff added an
additional parameter, tmpfsdir, to the API. This caused testimage to no
longer work in meta-zephyr. Add that parameter and everything
|
By
Jon Mason
·
#53262
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] ossec-hids: add new pkg
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
...Makefile-drop-running-scrips-install.patch | 37 +++
.../0002-Makefile-don-t-set-uid-gid.patch | 251 ++++++++++++++++++
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
...Makefile-drop-running-scrips-install.patch | 37 +++
.../0002-Makefile-don-t-set-uid-gid.patch | 251 ++++++++++++++++++
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#53261
·
|
|
Re: core-image-sato -staticdev issue
Hi Guys,
I am facing one more issue No eligible RPROVIDERs exist for 'core-image-sato'
Thanks & Regards,
Sateesh
--
Regards,
Sateesh
Hi Guys,
I am facing one more issue No eligible RPROVIDERs exist for 'core-image-sato'
Thanks & Regards,
Sateesh
--
Regards,
Sateesh
|
By
sateesh m
·
#53260
·
|
|
core-image-sato -staticdev issue
Hi Guys,
I am newly facing this when I want to build core-image-sato image. how can I fix this issue can anybody know please suggest me.
local.conf I enabled EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES +=
Hi Guys,
I am newly facing this when I want to build core-image-sato image. how can I fix this issue can anybody know please suggest me.
local.conf I enabled EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES +=
|
By
sateesh m
·
#53259
·
|
|
Re: core-image-sato -staticdev
Hi Sateesh,
It seems you're trying to install static development packages. if that's the case, then I think you should try adding "staticdev-pkgs" to the EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES variable in the
Hi Sateesh,
It seems you're trying to install static development packages. if that's the case, then I think you should try adding "staticdev-pkgs" to the EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES variable in the
|
By
Dorinda
·
#53258
·
|
|
core-image-sato -staticdev
Hi Guys,
I am newly facing this when I want to build core-image-sato image. how can I fix this issue can anybody know please suggest me.
Loading cache: 100% |
Hi Guys,
I am newly facing this when I want to build core-image-sato image. how can I fix this issue can anybody know please suggest me.
Loading cache: 100% |
|
By
sateesh m
·
#53257
·
|
|
OpenBIOS
What is the relationship between OpenBIOS and YOCTO? Between OpenBIOS and U-boot?
What is the relationship between OpenBIOS and YOCTO? Between OpenBIOS and U-boot?
|
By
jchludzinski
·
#53256
·
|
|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper 4/4] config.json: add a target to test standalone X11 image
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
---
config.json | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
index 6de85a4..b38bc61 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
---
config.json | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
index 6de85a4..b38bc61 100644
---
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#53255
·
|
|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper 3/4] config.json: pam is required when weston starts under systemd
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
---
config.json | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
index 8e0f0ac..6de85a4
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
---
config.json | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
index 8e0f0ac..6de85a4
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#53254
·
|
|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper 2/4] config.json: replace core-image-sato with core-image-weston
I believe the time has come for YP to be defaulting to Wayland
and not X11.
X11 is effectively deprecated technology at this point with
only minimal maintenance; standalone X server will not
I believe the time has come for YP to be defaulting to Wayland
and not X11.
X11 is effectively deprecated technology at this point with
only minimal maintenance; standalone X server will not
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#53253
·
|
|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper 1/4] config.json: transition ptests to weston-based images
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
---
config.json | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
index
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
---
config.json | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
index
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#53252
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 0/7] OP-TEE support for ARM and rk3399
On 4/23/21 11:58 AM, Yann Dirson wrote:
In general, it seems like a lot of these changes should be in the upstream recipes, not the meta-rockchip bbappends.
Also, the things
On 4/23/21 11:58 AM, Yann Dirson wrote:
In general, it seems like a lot of these changes should be in the upstream recipes, not the meta-rockchip bbappends.
Also, the things
|
By
Joshua Watt
·
#53251
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 7/7] WIP kernel config feature for OP-TEE activation
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
FIXME:
- provide an .scc with proper information
- maybe bundle with dts overlay
- select a more suitable path in config namespace
---
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
FIXME:
- provide an .scc with proper information
- maybe bundle with dts overlay
- select a more suitable path in config namespace
---
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#53250
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 6/7] WIP nanopi-m4: declare OP-TEE presence in devicetree
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
FIXME:
- this is not specific to the board, and would indeed apply to any SoC
supported by OP-TEE.
- should rather be selected by "optee" in
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
FIXME:
- this is not specific to the board, and would indeed apply to any SoC
supported by OP-TEE.
- should rather be selected by "optee" in
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#53249
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 5/7] RFC: optee: only enable the recipes when "optee" is included in DISTRO_FEATURES
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
This is meant as a safeguard against having optee-os included without the
required support in u-boot and trusted-firmware-a.
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
This is meant as a safeguard against having optee-os included without the
required support in u-boot and trusted-firmware-a.
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#53248
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 4/7] RFC optee: new "optee" DISTRO_FEATURE to enable optee-os integration
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
This sets up a central switch for OP-TEE operation, activating support
in all dependent recipes at the same time:
- u-boot
- trusted-firmware-a
- kernel (not
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
This sets up a central switch for OP-TEE operation, activating support
in all dependent recipes at the same time:
- u-boot
- trusted-firmware-a
- kernel (not
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#53247
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 3/7] optee-os: enable rk3399 support, including serial console support
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
As discussed in https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/4542, ASLR
support currently has to be disabled for OP-TEE to boot.
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
As discussed in https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/4542, ASLR
support currently has to be disabled for OP-TEE to boot.
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#53246
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 2/7] u-boot: include optee-os as BL32 when requested by DISTRO_FEATURE
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
This causes OP-TEE to get included into the u-boot.itb fitImage so u-boot
can load it for the trusted-firmware-a BL31 to run it.
This has to be enabled
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
This causes OP-TEE to get included into the u-boot.itb fitImage so u-boot
can load it for the trusted-firmware-a BL31 to run it.
This has to be enabled
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#53245
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 0/7] OP-TEE support for ARM and rk3399
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
Changes from v2:
- turn the DISTRO_FEATURE idea into separate RFC patches so as to allow
merging of basic support
- remove optee-os patch that proved
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
Changes from v2:
- turn the DISTRO_FEATURE idea into separate RFC patches so as to allow
merging of basic support
- remove optee-os patch that proved
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#53244
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v3 1/7] trusted-firmware-a: include optee support when requested by DISTRO_FEATURE
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
This instructs TF-A to:
- load OP-TEE OS as BL32, but still relies on the actual image to be
provided through other means, eg. in u-boot.itb
- run
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
This instructs TF-A to:
- load OP-TEE OS as BL32, but still relies on the actual image to be
provided through other means, eg. in u-boot.itb
- run
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#53243
·
|