i just noticed that both of the layers meta-secure-core and meta-security: https://github.com/jiazhang0/meta-secure-core https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-security seem to include a

Observed same error.

Thank you Chuck Wolber for valuable response. Yeah I have tried it with cleanstate on opencv and build it again but still did not worked.

Did you try doing a cleansstate on opencv and attempting the build again? ..Ch:W.. -- "Perfection must be reached by degrees; she requires the slow hand of time." - Voltaire

For Arm EXT SDK support: Can I modify the EXT SDK build env paths from “sdk-extra.conf” so as to reference the “vivado” env? Is there a way to build in support so the “module load”

Observing following error while generationg rootfs with Packages of opencv 2.4 and 3.1 RROR: opencv-3.1+gitAUTOINC+92387b1ef8-r0 do_package: Error executing a python function in exec_python_func()

Thanks for your patience… I was able to followed your advice and I am now able to build and install the Extended SDK for our Intel platform… Can you tell me when building for Arm/Xilinx

My thoughts on this after working on this for the nanopi-m4 have changed a bit: it looks like the existing kmeta system already provides us with everything we need: - the kmeta BSP mechanism already

From: Yann Dirson <yann@...> This second iteration adds support for KBUILD_DEFCONFIG=3D"", as well as a loosely-related patch to avoid touching KCONFIG_MODE. Kernel weight: - standard

From: Yann Dirson <yann@...> This patch provides "standard" and "tiny" BSP. There is still much work to be done in dispatching feature to individual scc files - the more boards we can

From: Yann Dirson <yann@...> Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson <yann@...> --- conf/machine/include/nanopi-m4.inc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git

From: Yann Dirson <yann@...> Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson <yann@...> --- ...{linux-yocto-dev.bbappend =3D> linux-yocto%.bbappend} | 0

From: Yann Dirson <yann@...> When using in-kernel defconfig this is already the default, but linux-yocto defaults to "allnoconfig" mode when a defconfig is specified in SRC_URI, and there

Hi all, I successfully compile/create a target image and binaries for a BeagleBone Black: MACHINE ?= "beaglebone-yocto" The resulting wic image does not boot, when I write it to a sdcard nor when I

Hello All, This is the full report for yocto-3.2.3.rc1: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults ======= Summary ======== No high

Hi all. I make two images image1 image1-installer In image1 I don't need any getty so i'd like to put SYSVINIT_ENALED_GETTYS := "" image1.bb give the output image1.sdcard SYSVINIT_ENABLED_GETTYS :=

i note that the linux-yocto repo has a nxp-s32g2xx branch: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto/commit/?h=v5.10/standard/nxp-sdk-5.4/nxp-s32g2xx so wondering about the subsequent

I think this is a really good discussion, but I wonder why you want to go back in time.. I expect users of dunfell branch (which is an LTS from YP perspectives) would be rather unhappy to see such a

Hi all I need to speedup the build. I use package_deb as package method. I see that the bottlenek is gzip When yocto runs gzip the cpu runs to 100%, with xz 600% (the pc has 6 core (12threads)) I'd

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for March 30, 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == disclaimer == Best efforts are made