|
[yocto-autobuilder-helper][dunfell 03/23] scripts/generate-testresult-index: Ensure backwards compatibility with older layout
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
(cherry picked from commit
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
(cherry picked from commit
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#52855
·
|
|
[yocto-autobuilder-helper][dunfell 02/23] scripts/generate-testresult-index: Update after 'posttrigger' renaming broke the index generation
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
(cherry picked from commit
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
(cherry picked from commit
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#52854
·
|
|
[yocto-autobuilder-helper][dunfell 01/23] scripts: Add runqemu-renice.c for renicing runqemu
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
(cherry picked from commit
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
(cherry picked from commit
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#52853
·
|
|
[yocto-autobuilder-helper][dunfell 00/23] Patch review
Please review the following patches for dunfell and have comments back by end of day Friday.
Passed a-full on
Please review the following patches for dunfell and have comments back by end of day Friday.
Passed a-full on
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#52852
·
|
|
Can't build gatesgarth after PSEUDO_IGNORE_PATHS change in poky
Hi,
The patch to add intercept_scripts to PSEUDO_IGNORE_PATHS breaks all my builds. This is commit edc8051bc09648433ec16a5b6a8ae0b87f50d9d6 on the gatesgarth branch.
I get a large number of
Hi,
The patch to add intercept_scripts to PSEUDO_IGNORE_PATHS breaks all my builds. This is commit edc8051bc09648433ec16a5b6a8ae0b87f50d9d6 on the gatesgarth branch.
I get a large number of
|
By
Ramsay, Lincoln <Lincoln.Ramsay@...>
·
#52851
·
|
|
Adding x86 machine to BSP layer for unit tests on host
#rocko
#sdk
#native
Hello,
Currently using Rocko to generate toolchains for ARM targets.
Our BSP layer that is able to build a toolchain for our target architecture, ARM. I'd like to be able to add an x86 machine to this
Hello,
Currently using Rocko to generate toolchains for ARM targets.
Our BSP layer that is able to build a toolchain for our target architecture, ARM. I'd like to be able to add an x86 machine to this
|
By
bschaefer@...
·
#52850
·
|
|
Re: Private: Re: [poky] Weird Compilation issue with a c++ recipe
Adding yp mailing list back.
but the logs you posted doesn't show this as CXX, so somewhere its
being overwritten. Are there more CMakeFiles that are in play ?
Adding yp mailing list back.
but the logs you posted doesn't show this as CXX, so somewhere its
being overwritten. Are there more CMakeFiles that are in play ?
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#52849
·
|
|
Re: #yocto #sdk
#yocto
#sdk
The output you see is from setting:
SDK_EXT_TYPE = "minimal"
SDK_INCLUDE_TOOLCHAIN = "1"
When building minimal only, there are no errors/warnings (and no tools...)
The output you see is from setting:
SDK_EXT_TYPE = "minimal"
SDK_INCLUDE_TOOLCHAIN = "1"
When building minimal only, there are no errors/warnings (and no tools...)
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#52848
·
|
|
[ptest-runner][PATCH 4/4v2] utils.c: wait_child reimplement timeout using alarm
Since we are using threads to read from child, no complex logic is
needed for handle timeouts by std{out,err} in the child using alarm(2).
[YOCTO #14220]
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón
Since we are using threads to read from child, no complex logic is
needed for handle timeouts by std{out,err} in the child using alarm(2).
[YOCTO #14220]
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón
|
By
Anibal Limon
·
#52847
·
|
|
Re: #yocto #sdk
#yocto
#sdk
I think there still are signature differences. perhaps try to add incremntally on top of minimal sdk and see where it breaks.
I think there still are signature differences. perhaps try to add incremntally on top of minimal sdk and see where it breaks.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#52846
·
|
|
Re: [ptest-runner][PATCH 1/2] Add support to specify timeout by ptest
Ack, I changed the behavior of timeout so that's the reason I'm seeing this error.
I don't see any reason to not support this may be useful in the future.
Regards,
Anibal
Ack, I changed the behavior of timeout so that's the reason I'm seeing this error.
I don't see any reason to not support this may be useful in the future.
Regards,
Anibal
|
By
Anibal Limon
·
#52845
·
|
|
Re: [ptest-runner][PATCH 4/4] utils.c: wait_child reimplement timeout using alarm
Yeah, thanks for remind me the old behavior, some years and I forget about it, I will fix it and put certain comments about that.
I pushed to dev
Yeah, thanks for remind me the old behavior, some years and I forget about it, I will fix it and put certain comments about that.
I pushed to dev
|
By
Anibal Limon
·
#52844
·
|
|
Re: Change (and remove unused) init system on a per-image basis
#yocto
#bitbake
#systemd
#sysvinit
you are better off by having two different DISTROs like poky and poky-altcfg is.
you are better off by having two different DISTROs like poky and poky-altcfg is.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#52843
·
|
|
Re: Creating a FIT Image with INITRAMFs
initramfs images are a bit special. it should say
IMAGE_FSTYPES = "${INITRAMFS_FSTYPES}"
and perhaps then you should be able to build your full image which is not this image but this image will be
initramfs images are a bit special. it should say
IMAGE_FSTYPES = "${INITRAMFS_FSTYPES}"
and perhaps then you should be able to build your full image which is not this image but this image will be
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#52842
·
|
|
Re: [ptest-runner][PATCH 1/2] Add support to specify timeout by ptest
I don't see a huge amount of use of `timeout-ptest` since
many tests I looked at have their own timeout mechanism built-in to individual tests (OR we have patched in... ex: valgrind).
This has the
I don't see a huge amount of use of `timeout-ptest` since
many tests I looked at have their own timeout mechanism built-in to individual tests (OR we have patched in... ex: valgrind).
This has the
|
By
Yi Fan Yu
·
#52841
·
|
|
Re: #yocto #sdk
#yocto
#sdk
I corrected for the sig warnings, but still have an issue with the extended SDK installing correctly
(though I think I am close…)
Note: The only issue now appears to be around the
I corrected for the sig warnings, but still have an issue with the extended SDK installing correctly
(though I think I am close…)
Note: The only issue now appears to be around the
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#52840
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][PATCH] conf/layer.conf: Add hardknott support
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@...>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
index
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@...>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
index
|
By
Anibal Limon
·
#52839
·
|
|
Re: [ptest-runner][PATCH 4/4] utils.c: wait_child reimplement timeout using alarm
TY for the patches.
This would change its behaviour to timeout exactly at X seconds.
New behaviour: if test exceeds X seconds, gets killed.
Old behaviour: if test exceeds X seconds with no output,
TY for the patches.
This would change its behaviour to timeout exactly at X seconds.
New behaviour: if test exceeds X seconds, gets killed.
Old behaviour: if test exceeds X seconds with no output,
|
By
Yi Fan Yu
·
#52838
·
|
|
Change (and remove unused) init system on a per-image basis
#yocto
#bitbake
#systemd
#sysvinit
Hi all,
I would like to change the init system (systemd / SysVinit) on a per-image basis.
Therefore I added both "systemd" and "sysvinit" to my DISTRO_FEATURES.
I set this inside my image-systemd.bb
Hi all,
I would like to change the init system (systemd / SysVinit) on a per-image basis.
Therefore I added both "systemd" and "sysvinit" to my DISTRO_FEATURES.
I set this inside my image-systemd.bb
|
By
lel@...
·
#52837
·
|
|
#yocto #linux #uboot fitImage is not installed by default into the rootfs and not packages
#yocto
#linux
#uboot
Hi everyone,
I'm using Poky with a master branch, I'm enabling the fitImage. Unfortunately, the fitImage is not packaged and not installed into the root file system.
Here is my updates in the
Hi everyone,
I'm using Poky with a master branch, I'm enabling the fitImage. Unfortunately, the fitImage is not packaged and not installed into the root file system.
Here is my updates in the
|
By
Ilies CHERGUI
·
#52836
·
|