|
Re: #yocto #sdk
#yocto
#sdk
I corrected for the sig warnings, but still have an issue with the extended SDK installing correctly
(though I think I am close…)
Note: The only issue now appears to be around the
I corrected for the sig warnings, but still have an issue with the extended SDK installing correctly
(though I think I am close…)
Note: The only issue now appears to be around the
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#52840
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][PATCH] conf/layer.conf: Add hardknott support
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@...>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
index
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@...>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
index
|
By
Anibal Limon
·
#52839
·
|
|
Re: [ptest-runner][PATCH 4/4] utils.c: wait_child reimplement timeout using alarm
TY for the patches.
This would change its behaviour to timeout exactly at X seconds.
New behaviour: if test exceeds X seconds, gets killed.
Old behaviour: if test exceeds X seconds with no output,
TY for the patches.
This would change its behaviour to timeout exactly at X seconds.
New behaviour: if test exceeds X seconds, gets killed.
Old behaviour: if test exceeds X seconds with no output,
|
By
Yi Fan Yu
·
#52838
·
|
|
Change (and remove unused) init system on a per-image basis
#yocto
#bitbake
#systemd
#sysvinit
Hi all,
I would like to change the init system (systemd / SysVinit) on a per-image basis.
Therefore I added both "systemd" and "sysvinit" to my DISTRO_FEATURES.
I set this inside my image-systemd.bb
Hi all,
I would like to change the init system (systemd / SysVinit) on a per-image basis.
Therefore I added both "systemd" and "sysvinit" to my DISTRO_FEATURES.
I set this inside my image-systemd.bb
|
By
lel@...
·
#52837
·
|
|
#yocto #linux #uboot fitImage is not installed by default into the rootfs and not packages
#yocto
#linux
#uboot
Hi everyone,
I'm using Poky with a master branch, I'm enabling the fitImage. Unfortunately, the fitImage is not packaged and not installed into the root file system.
Here is my updates in the
Hi everyone,
I'm using Poky with a master branch, I'm enabling the fitImage. Unfortunately, the fitImage is not packaged and not installed into the root file system.
Here is my updates in the
|
By
Ilies CHERGUI
·
#52836
·
|
|
Re: Creating a FIT Image with INITRAMFs
Greetings !
Processor : i.MX8MM
Yocto : 2.7.1 (warrior)
I am trying to crate a "initramfs image" bundling with the "Kernel image".
Below mentioned is the link and which I am following
Greetings !
Processor : i.MX8MM
Yocto : 2.7.1 (warrior)
I am trying to crate a "initramfs image" bundling with the "Kernel image".
Below mentioned is the link and which I am following
|
By
poornesh.g@...
·
#52835
·
|
|
Re: Quectel EG25-G LTE modem
Thanks,
I managed to compile it in the meantime with this recipe:
DESCRIPTION = "Quectel-CM"
SECTION = "quectel"
LICENSE="CLOSED"
SRC_URI = "file://files/* "
TARGET_CC_ARCH +=
Thanks,
I managed to compile it in the meantime with this recipe:
DESCRIPTION = "Quectel-CM"
SECTION = "quectel"
LICENSE="CLOSED"
SRC_URI = "file://files/* "
TARGET_CC_ARCH +=
|
By
Zoltan Kerenyi Nagy
·
#52834
·
|
|
Re: Quectel EG25-G LTE modem
Hi Zolee,
You might want to have a look at our LuneOS meta-smartphone layer where one of our devs added the modem support for the modem of the PinePhone which seems to be the same
Hi Zolee,
You might want to have a look at our LuneOS meta-smartphone layer where one of our devs added the modem support for the modem of the PinePhone which seems to be the same
|
By
Herman van Hazendonk (Herrie)
·
#52833
·
|
|
Quectel EG25-G LTE modem
Hi,
I'm trying to make a recipie for a quectel-cm driver. I created a folder for it and put all the source files into a file folder.
This would be the first time that I'm making a recipie for multiple
Hi,
I'm trying to make a recipie for a quectel-cm driver. I created a folder for it and put all the source files into a file folder.
This would be the first time that I'm making a recipie for multiple
|
By
Zoltan Kerenyi Nagy
·
#52832
·
|
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.3_M3.rc2)
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.3_M3.rc2. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.3_M3.rc2. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
|
By
Sangeeta Jain
·
#52831
·
|
|
QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.3_M3.rc2)
A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.3_M3.rc2) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.3_M3.rc2
Build hash information:
bitbake:
A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.3_M3.rc2) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.3_M3.rc2
Build hash information:
bitbake:
|
By
Pokybuild User <pokybuild@...>
·
#52830
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip] defconfig alternatives
The above (if I'm reading it correctly) sounds quite similar to something I
had already started a while back. So I'll go ahead and publish this
work-in-progress. Maybe if I'm lucky it might spark some
The above (if I'm reading it correctly) sounds quite similar to something I
had already started a while back. So I'll go ahead and publish this
work-in-progress. Maybe if I'm lucky it might spark some
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#52829
·
|
|
Re: [error-report-web] [PATCH] Post/parser: Use bleach to sanitse XSS input
would need to add that to `requirements.txt`
i tested it quickly and it gave me bleach not found
would it make more sense to bleach/sanitize the raw data before it got parsed into a json object so
would need to add that to `requirements.txt`
i tested it quickly and it gave me bleach not found
would it make more sense to bleach/sanitize the raw data before it got parsed into a json object so
|
By
Yi Fan Yu
·
#52828
·
|
|
[ptest-runner][PATCH 1/2] Add support to specify timeout by ptest
The ptest-runner has a default timeout of 300 secs and can be override
usint -t option in the runner.
There is a need to specify timeout by ptest because not all ptests takes
the sametime also are
The ptest-runner has a default timeout of 300 secs and can be override
usint -t option in the runner.
There is a need to specify timeout by ptest because not all ptests takes
the sametime also are
|
By
Anibal Limon
·
#52827
·
|
|
[ptest-runner][PATCH 2/2] tests: Update to cover ptest timeout by file
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@...>
---
tests/ptest_list.c | 10 +++++-----
tests/utils.c | 14 +++++++-------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@...>
---
tests/ptest_list.c | 10 +++++-----
tests/utils.c | 14 +++++++-------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git
|
By
Anibal Limon
·
#52826
·
|
|
Re: Build wayland/weston from source?
Petalinux is a xilinx product? You need to ask xilinx to support you.
Alex
Petalinux is a xilinx product? You need to ask xilinx to support you.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#52825
·
|
|
Build wayland/weston from source?
Hi. I'm probably not exactly on topic in the yocto mailing list, but thought maybe someone can point me into the right direction.
What I want to do:
I've made a modification to weston and am planning
Hi. I'm probably not exactly on topic in the yocto mailing list, but thought maybe someone can point me into the right direction.
What I want to do:
I've made a modification to weston and am planning
|
By
Haase, Juergen [ext]
·
#52824
·
|
|
Yocto Project Status WW11`21
Current Dev Position: YP 3.3 M4 (Feature Freeze)
Next Deadline: 5th April 2021 YP 3.3 M4 build
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday Mar. 25th at 7:30am PDT
Current Dev Position: YP 3.3 M4 (Feature Freeze)
Next Deadline: 5th April 2021 YP 3.3 M4 build
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday Mar. 25th at 7:30am PDT
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#52823
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v3] NanoPi-M4: add machines
Applied, thanks! :-)
Anecdotally, having the bmap file available has the following effect on
writing a core-image-base image to a µSD card:
without: 33s
with: 11s
Applied, thanks! :-)
Anecdotally, having the bmap file available has the following effect on
writing a core-image-base image to a µSD card:
without: 33s
with: 11s
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#52822
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip] defconfig alternatives
Hi Trevor,
On my side I have a minimal defconfig for our own board, which is very similar
to the nanopi-m4, which could be used as a starting point for the latter.
One possibility would be using a
Hi Trevor,
On my side I have a minimal defconfig for our own board, which is very similar
to the nanopi-m4, which could be used as a starting point for the latter.
One possibility would be using a
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#52821
·
|