Hi Yann, Thanks for your contribution! :-) Traditionally in meta-rockchip this is done using two separate machine files with all the common things factored into a common include file.

Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...> --- conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf index f9de654ad9f4..8e6b15d18d52

From: Yann Dirson <yann@...> This supports both the 2GB and 4GB versions of the board. This is not done with 2 different machine definitions since only u-boot has to change between those

Hello. I find it. Inside a software there two executables programs which need QtWebKit. So yocto warn me to include QtWebKit in the imge. MZ Sent from Mailspring, the best free email app for work

From: Ming Liu <liu.ming50@...> IMA_POLICY is being referred as policy recipe name in some places and it is also being referred as policy file in other places, they are conflicting with each

Hi Zoran, here is the cat /proc/cmdline output of my cm3- coherent_pool=1M snd_bcm2835.enable_compat_alsa=0 snd_bcm2835.enable_hdmi=1 snd_bcm2835.enable_headphones=1 bcm2708_fb.fbwidth=720

Not sure if you did represent these values correctly?! I have for enc28j60:something like this: interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>; interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; Where <&gpio2> is gpio chip name

My problem is I have an 1553 chip (an avionic data bus) connected to the HPS master (an ARM processor) via an FPGA (soft) SPI controller. This is where the spi-altera.c comes in. It provides the

How is it possible to build a loadable module from spi-altera.c when it has no code for creating udev files (i.e., /dev/spidevXX); it has no: static int __init spidev_init(void) { int status;

Using 'make nconfig' I selected the following options: (Keep in mind I using an Altera/Intel Arria 10 SoC which uses DesignWare hard SPI controllers. BUT the SPI controllers I'm concerned with now are

i did write that a while back while i was still figuring it out. :-) i agree that it would be inappropriate in the *regular* sections of the docs, but i'm convinced it would be worth explaining

Hi Robert, Don't use _prepend but =. BEFORE the other includes in your machine configuration files otherwise the order in MACHINEOVERRIDES is incorrect. Do NOT use append, or .=, they result in

Add python package Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- .../swtpm/{swtpm_0.2.0.bb => swtpm_0.5.2.bb} | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

LIC_FILES_CHKSUM hash changed between branches. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- .../{tpm2-tss-engine_1.0.1.bb => tpm2-tss-engine_1.1.0.bb} | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3

it appears (after a *very* cursory investigation) that shared-mime-info-native is included, which drags in xmlto-native, which then drags in docbook stuff. i'll confirm that later. rday

Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards, Mike Looijmans System Expert TOPIC Embedded Products B.V. Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best The Netherlands T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69 E:

most likely, but as i'm explicitly not installing any documentation, i'm now poking around to see what insists on building that for no apparent reason. rday

It's not related to yp-docs at least. most likely some recipes that use docbook for their docs/man pages, no?

years ago, i asked about how to support a small set of closely-related targets using MACHINEOVERRIDES to define how to apply patches in a (somewhat) hierarchical

testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there something that still needs docbook support? i'm about to take a