|
Re: Trouble booting basic x86 image
It looks like you are using the live option in hddimg image? Can you
try adding "rootwait" to kernel parameters and see if that works?
Not sure why it's not dropping to shell, but may be try adding
It looks like you are using the live option in hddimg image? Can you
try adding "rootwait" to kernel parameters and see if that works?
Not sure why it's not dropping to shell, but may be try adding
|
By
Anuj Mittal
·
#52456
·
|
|
Re: Kernel Header UAPI Issue
Hi,
A kernel recipe will provide linux-libc-headers after a
"make headers_install" call...
So the SRC_URI of linux-libc-headers can be the same as from the
linux kernel recipe, or linux kernel
Hi,
A kernel recipe will provide linux-libc-headers after a
"make headers_install" call...
So the SRC_URI of linux-libc-headers can be the same as from the
linux kernel recipe, or linux kernel
|
By
Mikko Rapeli
·
#52455
·
|
|
Re: Kernel Header UAPI Issue
Hi Mikko,
Do you have an example on how you do that ? Do you bbapend the
linux-libc-headers recipe file ?
I have an application that uses dmabuf heap that potentially extends
across multiple BSP's as
Hi Mikko,
Do you have an example on how you do that ? Do you bbapend the
linux-libc-headers recipe file ?
I have an application that uses dmabuf heap that potentially extends
across multiple BSP's as
|
By
Karthik Poduval
·
#52454
·
|
|
Re: Updating Yocto
Yes, we're talking about the same thing :)
A lot of yocto things don't work well if major changes happen and WORKDIR
isn't completely cleaned in between. With various BSP layers things
can be even
Yes, we're talking about the same thing :)
A lot of yocto things don't work well if major changes happen and WORKDIR
isn't completely cleaned in between. With various BSP layers things
can be even
|
By
Mikko Rapeli
·
#52453
·
|
|
Re: Updating Yocto
I mentioned that we remove that directory, and it does indeed solve a
lot of problems. Not sure that it was clear from the original message,
but whenever we get a random error on the first build
I mentioned that we remove that directory, and it does indeed solve a
lot of problems. Not sure that it was clear from the original message,
but whenever we get a random error on the first build
|
By
Claude Bing
·
#52452
·
|
|
Re: Kernel Header UAPI Issue
Hi,
I know it's not the best or recommended approach, but I find it
hard to avoid merging linux-libc-headers recipe with the actual
kernel recipe that a distro is using. At least a static copy
of
Hi,
I know it's not the best or recommended approach, but I find it
hard to avoid merging linux-libc-headers recipe with the actual
kernel recipe that a distro is using. At least a static copy
of
|
By
Mikko Rapeli
·
#52451
·
|
|
Re: Updating Yocto
Hi,
When both yocto update and your own changes are modifying the same recipes,
then conflicts can occur.
If builds are failing, then your environment is breaking something.
It might even be the BSP
Hi,
When both yocto update and your own changes are modifying the same recipes,
then conflicts can occur.
If builds are failing, then your environment is breaking something.
It might even be the BSP
|
By
Mikko Rapeli
·
#52450
·
|
|
Re: [error-report-web][PATCH] report-error.bbclass: Add layer and bitbake version info to error report
Hi All,
This has not been reviewed yet and it is given since January 6th.
Please review it and provide review comments if any as soon as possible to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Milan Shah
Hi All,
This has not been reviewed yet and it is given since January 6th.
Please review it and provide review comments if any as soon as possible to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Milan Shah
|
By
Milan Shah
·
#52449
·
|
|
Trouble booting basic x86 image
Yocto Gatesgarth, using meta-intel to build core-image-minimal
Intel D2700MUD mini-ITX mobo with D2700 Atom
Ordinary USB 2.0 flash drive
I followed the instructions in the meta-intel README, and had
Yocto Gatesgarth, using meta-intel to build core-image-minimal
Intel D2700MUD mini-ITX mobo with D2700 Atom
Ordinary USB 2.0 flash drive
I followed the instructions in the meta-intel README, and had
|
By
Paul D. DeRocco
·
#52448
·
|
|
#toolchain #sdk #qt5 - compiler missing from from do_populate_sdk
#toolchain
#sdk
#qt5
Hi,
We have a functioning image built for our device/platform based on Ti Processor SDK 04.03.00.05; at this point I'm trying to build an SDK for the image that I can distribute to other members of
Hi,
We have a functioning image built for our device/platform based on Ti Processor SDK 04.03.00.05; at this point I'm trying to build an SDK for the image that I can distribute to other members of
|
By
vitalEol
·
#52447
·
|
|
Re: [error-report-web][PATCH] parser: make contains_tag ignore non-str fields
RP,
if you want to get this merged too that would be great.
yifan
RP,
if you want to get this merged too that would be great.
yifan
|
By
Yi Fan Yu
·
#52446
·
|
|
[error-report-web][PATCH] Update to be compatible with python3.5
mostly changed the way to access request.GET
also tested on python2.7 to be backward compatible
Signed-off-by: Yi Fan Yu <yifan.yu@...>
---
Post/parser.py | 2 +-
Post/views.py | 14
mostly changed the way to access request.GET
also tested on python2.7 to be backward compatible
Signed-off-by: Yi Fan Yu <yifan.yu@...>
---
Post/parser.py | 2 +-
Post/views.py | 14
|
By
Yi Fan Yu
·
#52445
·
|
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.6.rc1)
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.1.6.rc1 We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1. OE-Core
2.
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.1.6.rc1 We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1. OE-Core
2.
|
By
Sangeeta Jain
·
#52444
·
|
|
Re: Kernel Header UAPI Issue
Hi Khem and Bruce,
I got the patch from raspberry pi github and it looked like it put the header into include/uapi/linux/dma-heap.h, for kernel 5.4 it doesn't look like there is a need for a Kbuild
Hi Khem and Bruce,
I got the patch from raspberry pi github and it looked like it put the header into include/uapi/linux/dma-heap.h, for kernel 5.4 it doesn't look like there is a need for a Kbuild
|
By
Karthik Poduval
·
#52443
·
|
|
Re: Kernel Header UAPI Issue
<karthik.poduval@...> wrote:
That's coming from the linux-libc-headers, your new upi header is not
part of the libc-headers package, so it won't show up there. And no,
it shouldn't be part of
<karthik.poduval@...> wrote:
That's coming from the linux-libc-headers, your new upi header is not
part of the libc-headers package, so it won't show up there. And no,
it shouldn't be part of
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#52442
·
|
|
Re: Kernel Header UAPI Issue
<karthik.poduval@...> wrote:
What does patch look like? just adding the file is not enough, it
should be added to makefiles to be exported as UAPI header
<karthik.poduval@...> wrote:
What does patch look like? just adding the file is not enough, it
should be added to makefiles to be exported as UAPI header
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#52441
·
|
|
Kernel Header UAPI Issue
I have a 5.4 kernel where I applied a patch (using a .scc file) from
kernel 5.6 which brings in dmabuf heaps.
The patch exports a uapi header
include/uapi/linux/dma-heap.h.
I am trying to write an
I have a 5.4 kernel where I applied a patch (using a .scc file) from
kernel 5.6 which brings in dmabuf heaps.
The patch exports a uapi header
include/uapi/linux/dma-heap.h.
I am trying to write an
|
By
Karthik Poduval
·
#52440
·
|
|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] send-qa-email: Save the QA email in case it doesn't reach the mailing lists.
Signed-off-by: Michael Halstead <mhalstead@...>
---
scripts/send-qa-email | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/send-qa-email b/scripts/send-qa-email
index
Signed-off-by: Michael Halstead <mhalstead@...>
---
scripts/send-qa-email | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/send-qa-email b/scripts/send-qa-email
index
|
By
Michael Halstead
·
#52439
·
|
|
QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.6.rc1)
A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.1.6.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.1.6.rc1
Build hash information:
bitbake:
A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.1.6.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.1.6.rc1
Build hash information:
bitbake:
|
By
Pokybuild User <pokybuild@...>
·
#52438
·
|
|
Enhancements/Bugs closed WW08!
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
richard.purdie@...
5
chee.yang.lee@...
1
dorindabassey@...
1
anuj.mittal@...
1
Grand
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
richard.purdie@...
5
chee.yang.lee@...
1
dorindabassey@...
1
anuj.mittal@...
1
Grand
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#52437
·
|