|
[dunfell][PATCH 2/2] bitbake: fetch/git: download LFS content too during do_fetch
From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoosier@...>
Insert an explicit pass to fetch all blobs needed by Git LFS, during the
fetch() function. This avoids the default behavior of Git LFS to wait
until 'git
From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoosier@...>
Insert an explicit pass to fetch all blobs needed by Git LFS, during the
fetch() function. This avoids the default behavior of Git LFS to wait
until 'git
|
By
Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@...>
·
#52145
·
|
|
[dunfell][PATCH 1/2] bitbake: git.py: Use the correct branch to check if the repository has LFS objects.
From: Mauro Queirós <maurofrqueiros@...>
Function "contains_lfs" was only looking at the master branch when searching for LFS
content. LFS may be configured in specific branches only, so we
From: Mauro Queirós <maurofrqueiros@...>
Function "contains_lfs" was only looking at the master branch when searching for LFS
content. LFS may be configured in specific branches only, so we
|
By
Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@...>
·
#52144
·
|
|
Re: git lfs not working in dunfell
There is a patch in bitbake master related to this which you may want
to test and maybe request for adding to dunfell if it
There is a patch in bitbake master related to this which you may want
to test and maybe request for adding to dunfell if it
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#52143
·
|
|
[meta-mingw] [PATCH 2/2] README: Add instructions for configuring git repo for sending patches
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
---
README | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/README b/README
index c17f74a..af3ace9 100644
--- a/README
+++
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
---
README | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/README b/README
index c17f74a..af3ace9 100644
--- a/README
+++
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#52142
·
|
|
[meta-mingw] [PATCH 1/2] libiconv: Update to work with autoconf 2.70
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
---
.../libiconv/libiconv/autoconf270.patch | 17 +++++++++++++++++
recipes-support/libiconv/libiconv_1.15.bb | 3
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
---
.../libiconv/libiconv/autoconf270.patch | 17 +++++++++++++++++
recipes-support/libiconv/libiconv_1.15.bb | 3
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#52141
·
|
|
[meta-gplv2] [PATCH 3/3] grep: Update to work with autoconf 2.70
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
---
.../grep/grep-2.5.1a/autoconf270.patch | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
recipes-extended/grep/grep_2.5.1a.bb | 1 +
2
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
---
.../grep/grep-2.5.1a/autoconf270.patch | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
recipes-extended/grep/grep_2.5.1a.bb | 1 +
2
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#52140
·
|
|
[meta-gplv2] [PATCH 2/3] diffutils: Update to work with autoconf 2.70
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
---
.../diffutils/diffutils-2.8.1/autoconf270.patch | 17 +++++++++++++++++
recipes-extended/diffutils/diffutils_2.8.1.bb | 1 +
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
---
.../diffutils/diffutils-2.8.1/autoconf270.patch | 17 +++++++++++++++++
recipes-extended/diffutils/diffutils_2.8.1.bb | 1 +
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#52139
·
|
|
[meta-gplv2] [PATCH 1/3] bash: Update to work with autoconf 2.70
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
---
.../bash/bash-3.2.57/autoconf270.patch | 17 +++++++++++++++++
recipes-extended/bash/bash_3.2.57.bb | 1 +
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
---
.../bash/bash-3.2.57/autoconf270.patch | 17 +++++++++++++++++
recipes-extended/bash/bash_3.2.57.bb | 1 +
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#52138
·
|
|
Re: Kernel Initramfs Problems
I managed to get a workaround by using a do_rootfs postfunc, here it
is in case anyone else finds it useful
do_rootfs[depends] += "virtual/kernel:do_deploy"
do_rootfs[postfuncs] +=
I managed to get a workaround by using a do_rootfs postfunc, here it
is in case anyone else finds it useful
do_rootfs[depends] += "virtual/kernel:do_deploy"
do_rootfs[postfuncs] +=
|
By
Martin Townsend <mtownsend1973@...>
·
#52137
·
|
|
Re: Task only for target recipe
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
How are you running it? You've said you want it to run after do_install
but not what should trigger it.
Adding "before do_build" to the addtask line for example might
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
How are you running it? You've said you want it to run after do_install
but not what should trigger it.
Adding "before do_build" to the addtask line for example might
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#52136
·
|
|
Task only for target recipe
Hello I created a new task that I want to run for every recipe of my image but only for target recipes and skip all native, sdk,...
mytask.bbclass:
addtask do_mytask after do_install
do_mytask() {
Hello I created a new task that I want to run for every recipe of my image but only for target recipes and skip all native, sdk,...
mytask.bbclass:
addtask do_mytask after do_install
do_mytask() {
|
By
Ayoub Zaki
·
#52135
·
|
|
git lfs not working in dunfell
Hi,
I have repo where I'm using lfs. I've added to my SRC_URI =
"git://...... ;lfs=1" and the project is fetched but the issue is that
lfs files are shown as references only (content is not
Hi,
I have repo where I'm using lfs. I've added to my SRC_URI =
"git://...... ;lfs=1" and the project is fetched but the issue is that
lfs files are shown as references only (content is not
|
By
Marek Belisko
·
#52134
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][PATCH] policycoreutils: Improve reproducibility
LOCALEDIR should be set to target path,
e.g. /usr/share/locale not host absolute path.
This prevent to build reproducible package.
LOCALEDIR constructed from:
$(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/share/locale
Change
LOCALEDIR should be set to target path,
e.g. /usr/share/locale not host absolute path.
This prevent to build reproducible package.
LOCALEDIR constructed from:
$(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/share/locale
Change
|
By
Oleksiy Obitotskyy
·
#52133
·
|
|
Re: any interest in an official "meta-rubygems" layer?
interesting idea, i hadn't considered that. in the meantime, i think
we'll ponder what the structure of the new layer will look like, and
put together a first pass.
rday
interesting idea, i hadn't considered that. in the meantime, i think
we'll ponder what the structure of the new layer will look like, and
put together a first pass.
rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#52132
·
|
|
Re: any interest in an official "meta-rubygems" layer?
We would also find an official layer for gems interesting.
We are currently using the old ruby.bbclass from the meta-ruby layer
from openemebedded to build the gems.
We are also particularly
We would also find an official layer for gems interesting.
We are currently using the old ruby.bbclass from the meta-ruby layer
from openemebedded to build the gems.
We are also particularly
|
By
VIVAVIS AG
·
#52131
·
|
|
Re: [meta-zephyr] bitbake zephyr-helloworld configure failure
BBEXTEND = “native” is a perfectly fine patch to submit to meta-python. We tend to only make those changes when needed (as in your use case) rather than universally. Please submit a patch :)
BBEXTEND = “native” is a perfectly fine patch to submit to meta-python. We tend to only make those changes when needed (as in your use case) rather than universally. Please submit a patch :)
|
By
Tim Orling
·
#52130
·
|
|
Re: Including binary application as part of the image output
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
You could add a "do_deploy" task that places it there. See
meta/classes/deploy.bbclass and other recipes which add such a task.
Cheers,
Richard
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
You could add a "do_deploy" task that places it there. See
meta/classes/deploy.bbclass and other recipes which add such a task.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#52129
·
|
|
Re: Including binary application as part of the image output
OK, Making some progress. I added a package_tar to my conf file and now I get a nice little tar file with my app and its helpers in it! I might also play with the do_deploy command and see
OK, Making some progress. I added a package_tar to my conf file and now I get a nice little tar file with my app and its helpers in it! I might also play with the do_deploy command and see
|
By
chuck kamas
·
#52128
·
|
|
Re: any interest in an official "meta-rubygems" layer?
Regardless of its home, there seems to be interest in such a layer.
There is nothing stopping you from registering in the layer in the layer
index and see where it goes from there.
Ruby was part of
Regardless of its home, there seems to be interest in such a layer.
There is nothing stopping you from registering in the layer in the layer
index and see where it goes from there.
Ruby was part of
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#52127
·
|
|
Re: Including binary application as part of the image output
Thanks Khem and Chuck!
Yes, the application is built in its own bitbake recipe. I do see that there are rpm files built for the application, and that may be a way to upgrade
Thanks Khem and Chuck!
Yes, the application is built in its own bitbake recipe. I do see that there are rpm files built for the application, and that may be a way to upgrade
|
By
chuck kamas
·
#52126
·
|