|
OpenEmbedded Happy Hour January 27 5pm/1700 UTC
Hi,
Just a reminder about our upcoming OpenEmbedded Happy Hour on January 27 for
Europe/US timezones @ 1700/5pm UTC (12pm
Hi,
Just a reminder about our upcoming OpenEmbedded Happy Hour on January 27 for
Europe/US timezones @ 1700/5pm UTC (12pm
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#52093
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] rock-pi-4: Split our variant machinesy
Is there any way to make this work with both new (4.10, -dev, -tiny, -rt) and
old (5.4) kernels? What if we left the old rock-pi-4 MACHINE for the 5.4
kernel and required one of the new ones for
Is there any way to make this work with both new (4.10, -dev, -tiny, -rt) and
old (5.4) kernels? What if we left the old rock-pi-4 MACHINE for the 5.4
kernel and required one of the new ones for
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#52092
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] linux-yocto: Remove Rock Pi 4 patch for serial
D'oh! Thanks.
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#52091
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] linux-yocto: Remove Rock Pi 4 patch for serial
Ya, I saw that. We should probably remove the .patch file also.
Ya, I saw that. We should probably remove the .patch file also.
|
By
Joshua Watt
·
#52090
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] linux-yocto: Remove Rock Pi 4 patch for serial
Thanks, I've already pushed a patch for this one.
Thanks, I've already pushed a patch for this one.
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#52089
·
|
|
Re: [meta-tensorflow][PATCH 8/25] tensorflow-estimator: 1.13 -> 2.4
Hi Marek,
That's good to hear!
I suspect it's not much work to merge the fixes
and maintain the branch, but I'll leave it up to Hongxu.
../Randy
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
Hi Marek,
That's good to hear!
I suspect it's not much work to merge the fixes
and maintain the branch, but I'll leave it up to Hongxu.
../Randy
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
|
By
Randy MacLeod
·
#52088
·
|
|
Re: [meta-tensorflow][PATCH 8/25] tensorflow-estimator: 1.13 -> 2.4
Hi Randy,
<randy.macleod@...> wrote:
I have done some small changes and now have tensorflow from master
working on top of dunfell. Would you be interested in sharing changes
back and
Hi Randy,
<randy.macleod@...> wrote:
I have done some small changes and now have tensorflow from master
working on top of dunfell. Would you be interested in sharing changes
back and
|
By
Marek Belisko
·
#52087
·
|
|
#yocto #armv6 #raspberrypi #neon
#raspberrypi
#neon
#yocto
#armv6
Hello folks, i am trying to compile my image but we could see that i am missing neon fpu in my image. I can't use this feature because i have a raspberry pi zero w and i have armv6 on this
Hello folks, i am trying to compile my image but we could see that i am missing neon fpu in my image. I can't use this feature because i have a raspberry pi zero w and i have armv6 on this
|
By
safouane maaloul
·
#52086
·
|
|
Re: insmod - huawei E3372h kernel module
Hi,
If I intentionally typo in the defconfig file:
USB_NET_HUAWEI_CDC_NCM_cat=y
USB_NET_DRIVERS=y
USB_USBNET=y
The bitbake -f linux command doesn't recognize the change. It means to me that any change
Hi,
If I intentionally typo in the defconfig file:
USB_NET_HUAWEI_CDC_NCM_cat=y
USB_NET_DRIVERS=y
USB_USBNET=y
The bitbake -f linux command doesn't recognize the change. It means to me that any change
|
By
Zoltan Kerenyi Nagy
·
#52085
·
|
|
Re: Points to consider while moving to new yocto versions
Hi,
My comments are in-line
I would consider it "best practice" to somewhat try to stay up to date with recent yocto versions and plan for this from the beginning of your project.
What I mean is to
Hi,
My comments are in-line
I would consider it "best practice" to somewhat try to stay up to date with recent yocto versions and plan for this from the beginning of your project.
What I mean is to
|
By
Robert Berger
·
#52084
·
|
|
Re: NPM Fetcher & License collection in Yocto Zeus
Hey,
I figured to squeeze in a test and it seems that this is solved in Dunfell, at least I can’t trigger it even when trying and the folder structure used in the work directory has changed ->
Hey,
I figured to squeeze in a test and it seems that this is solved in Dunfell, at least I can’t trigger it even when trying and the folder structure used in the work directory has changed ->
|
By
Oliver Westermann
·
#52083
·
|
|
Re: Points to consider while moving to new yocto versions
Hi,
I'd start by looking at the relevant documentation section,
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#general-migration-considerations.
There you can also find a
Hi,
I'd start by looking at the relevant documentation section,
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#general-migration-considerations.
There you can also find a
|
By
Erik Boto
·
#52082
·
|
|
Re: QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.3_M2.rc1)
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.3_M2.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.3_M2.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
|
By
Sangeeta Jain
·
#52081
·
|
|
Points to consider while moving to new yocto versions
Hi All,
We are planning to move to New yocto from current one that is krogoth yocto to some updated one. We are not thinking to move to gates-garth or some other major release but the releases than
Hi All,
We are planning to move to New yocto from current one that is krogoth yocto to some updated one. We are not thinking to move to gates-garth or some other major release but the releases than
|
By
amaya jindal
·
#52080
·
|
|
Re: Writing a BSP from downstream kernel sources
By
Diego Santa Cruz
·
#52079
·
|
|
FW: JFFS2 File system support
Hi,
I am using TI based processor for our custom project. We are using NAND as our Boot media. The type of the File system we opted is JFFS2.
The following lines I have
Hi,
I am using TI based processor for our custom project. We are using NAND as our Boot media. The type of the File system we opted is JFFS2.
The following lines I have
|
By
sharmila.d@...
·
#52078
·
|
|
Re: #yocto #kernel setting up PREMIRRORS under zeus
#yocto
#kernel
Hi,
Please see my comments in-line.
I assume your sources are in /ede/tms/yocto/zeus/downloads/
Can you please try without the PATH at the end?
The manual does not mention anything like PATH at
Hi,
Please see my comments in-line.
I assume your sources are in /ede/tms/yocto/zeus/downloads/
Can you please try without the PATH at the end?
The manual does not mention anything like PATH at
|
By
Robert Berger
·
#52077
·
|
|
Re: #yocto #kernel setting up PREMIRRORS under zeus
#yocto
#kernel
not sure why that wouldn't work, it's what i've used for years.
rday
not sure why that wouldn't work, it's what i've used for years.
rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#52076
·
|
|
#yocto #kernel setting up PREMIRRORS under zeus
#yocto
#kernel
I am trying to setup PREMIRRORS to setup and point to the directory containing all the tar-balls for my build…
I was under the impression that the “SOURCE_MIRROR_URL” is a quick way to add a
I am trying to setup PREMIRRORS to setup and point to the directory containing all the tar-balls for my build…
I was under the impression that the “SOURCE_MIRROR_URL” is a quick way to add a
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#52075
·
|
|
Re: Writing a BSP from downstream kernel sources
Just to close this: it seems like the gcc-cross-arm used by yocto gatesgarth is too new for that specific downstream kernel (3.18.31).
The goal was to get a proper BSP package for this device for a
Just to close this: it seems like the gcc-cross-arm used by yocto gatesgarth is too new for that specific downstream kernel (3.18.31).
The goal was to get a proper BSP package for this device for a
|
By
Jonas Vautherin
·
#52074
·
|