|
Re: Reproducible builds and RPM packages
I have sussed out several behaviors of the image build having to do with reproducible builds. It seems like bitbake creates the rpm with the correct modification times per the reproducible_builds
I have sussed out several behaviors of the image build having to do with reproducible builds. It seems like bitbake creates the rpm with the correct modification times per the reproducible_builds
|
By
Jate Sujjavanich
·
#51373
·
|
|
Re: Qtwebengine recipe in yocto zeus (latest version)
#yocto
#zeus
#qt
it seems to be failing to find files on build host install and there were similar issues seen on chromium browswer long time ago which has been addressed in meta-browser. you might disable building
it seems to be failing to find files on build host install and there were similar issues seen on chromium browswer long time ago which has been addressed in meta-browser. you might disable building
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#51372
·
|
|
Re: Patch files before recipe is parsed
There's nothing in bitbake to support this. If you need to carry
patches against an EOL branch then you can either create a local fork
of poky or use a setup tool like kas
There's nothing in bitbake to support this. If you need to carry
patches against an EOL branch then you can either create a local fork
of poky or use a setup tool like kas
|
By
Paul Barker
·
#51371
·
|
|
Re: #yocto "zeus"
#yocto
are you using nfsvers= in /etc/fstab
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:44 AM Monsees, Steven C (US) via
lists.yoctoproject.org
<steven.monsees=baesystems.com@...> wrote:
are you using nfsvers= in /etc/fstab
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:44 AM Monsees, Steven C (US) via
lists.yoctoproject.org
<steven.monsees=baesystems.com@...> wrote:
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#51370
·
|
|
Re: #yocto "zeus"
#yocto
All things being equal, would you know why I might see
"NFS: bad mount option value specified: minorversion=1"
when running app under "zeus" but not under "rocko" ?
All things being equal, would you know why I might see
"NFS: bad mount option value specified: minorversion=1"
when running app under "zeus" but not under "rocko" ?
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#51369
·
|
|
Re: #yocto "zeus"
#yocto
you have to provide more context to help you more, but usually /dev is populated with devtmpfs during kernel boot. and similarly /etc is mounted early on. So access permissions could be mounting
you have to provide more context to help you more, but usually /dev is populated with devtmpfs during kernel boot. and similarly /etc is mounted early on. So access permissions could be mounting
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#51368
·
|
|
Patch files before recipe is parsed
There is a problem with the Yocto recipe for Python 3 in warrior. It
is missing ntpath in the list of core modules listed in
python3-manifest.json.
Since warrior is EOL, I was hoping to fix this by
There is a problem with the Yocto recipe for Python 3 in warrior. It
is missing ntpath in the list of core modules listed in
python3-manifest.json.
Since warrior is EOL, I was hoping to fix this by
|
By
Paul Adams
·
#51367
·
|
|
Qtwebengine recipe in yocto zeus (latest version)
#yocto
#zeus
#qt
Hello.
I hope you're going well in this period.
I'm working with yocto (zeus version) with a soc i.MX6 and kernel 4.19. Actually, I meet a weird issue about the recipe "qtwebengine" in all of my
Hello.
I hope you're going well in this period.
I'm working with yocto (zeus version) with a soc i.MX6 and kernel 4.19. Actually, I meet a weird issue about the recipe "qtwebengine" in all of my
|
By
anthony.marchand@...
·
#51366
·
|
|
#yocto "zeus"
#yocto
This is probably a simple question, but since I am new to yocto there is a lot to learn…
How do I establish kernel access permissions for the “zeus” kernel so that when my application is up
This is probably a simple question, but since I am new to yocto there is a lot to learn…
How do I establish kernel access permissions for the “zeus” kernel so that when my application is up
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#51365
·
|
|
Re: Emulator tool for imx8m
#linux
#devtool
#yocto
Thanks Andy,
I tried to boot the linux kernel using TFTP/NFS, i got this below error
BOOTP broadcast 1
DHCP client bound to address 10.78.216.7 (12 ms)
Using ethernet@30be0000 device
TFTP from server
Thanks Andy,
I tried to boot the linux kernel using TFTP/NFS, i got this below error
BOOTP broadcast 1
DHCP client bound to address 10.78.216.7 (12 ms)
Using ethernet@30be0000 device
TFTP from server
|
By
Amrun Nisha.R
·
#51364
·
|
|
Issue related to .wic image
Hi ,
We are compiling a core-image-sato-sdk.wic image using bitbake that time i am not able to copy anything into /lib/firmware folder.
but when i am compiling core-image-sato-sdk.hddimg
Hi ,
We are compiling a core-image-sato-sdk.wic image using bitbake that time i am not able to copy anything into /lib/firmware folder.
but when i am compiling core-image-sato-sdk.hddimg
|
By
NIKHIL PATIL <nikhilvp29@...>
·
#51363
·
|
|
#yocto zeus X11 keyboard
#yocto
I am running zeus based image (that runs without the following error under my rocko build), under zeus build I am now seeing the following :
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
>
I am running zeus based image (that runs without the following error under my rocko build), under zeus build I am now seeing the following :
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
>
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#51362
·
|
|
Re: Split kernel patches over different machines
Hi,
Thanks for the reply,
Yes, that did the trick.
Thanks, Talel
Hi,
Thanks for the reply,
Yes, that did the trick.
Thanks, Talel
|
By
Bel Hadj Salem Talel <bhstalel@...>
·
#51361
·
|
|
Re: Split kernel patches over different machines
Hi Talel,
SRC_URI_append_mezu-media = " file://media.patch"
is what you should use.
The issue with your suggestion is that it **replaces** the original
variable iff the recipe is built for
Hi Talel,
SRC_URI_append_mezu-media = " file://media.patch"
is what you should use.
The issue with your suggestion is that it **replaces** the original
variable iff the recipe is built for
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#51360
·
|
|
Split kernel patches over different machines
Hi All,
I created two different machines "menzu-console" and "menzu-media"
I have main patch for device tree for both , and only one patch specific for menzu-media machine
So in the linux recipe
Hi All,
I created two different machines "menzu-console" and "menzu-media"
I have main patch for device tree for both , and only one patch specific for menzu-media machine
So in the linux recipe
|
By
Bel Hadj Salem Talel <bhstalel@...>
·
#51359
·
|
|
Re: : When compiling code, how to make a package not hash checked?
hi Quentin,
At 2020-11-10 21:16:15, "Quentin Schulz" <quentin.schulz@...> wrote:>Hi Byron,>>On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 09:09:05PM +0800, ouyangxuan10@... wrote:>> Dear all,>> >> >> I would like to
hi Quentin,
At 2020-11-10 21:16:15, "Quentin Schulz" <quentin.schulz@...> wrote:>Hi Byron,>>On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 09:09:05PM +0800, ouyangxuan10@... wrote:>> Dear all,>> >> >> I would like to
|
By
ouyangxuan10@163.com
·
#51358
·
|
|
Re: python bump
Locally, as developer you always have a local branch where you can cherry-pick
changes. With git submodules and repo tooling, you should use a local or
project specific clone of poky. Or move all
Locally, as developer you always have a local branch where you can cherry-pick
changes. With git submodules and repo tooling, you should use a local or
project specific clone of poky. Or move all
|
By
Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@...>
·
#51357
·
|
|
How to create new variable in Yocto to use it in a recipe ?
Hi All,
I'm not trying to export or create a variable inside a recipe because that's easy and not my case.
But I want to create a variable that a user can define in local.conf or in other conf files
Hi All,
I'm not trying to export or create a variable inside a recipe because that's easy and not my case.
But I want to create a variable that a user can define in local.conf or in other conf files
|
By
Bel Hadj Salem Talel <bhstalel@...>
·
#51356
·
|
|
Re: python bump
If you don't really need 3.8 and 3.7.5 from warrior would be good enough for you, then backporting it to thud was relatively straightforward as implemented
If you don't really need 3.8 and 3.7.5 from warrior would be good enough for you, then backporting it to thud was relatively straightforward as implemented
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#51355
·
|
|
Re: python bump
Thanks for sharing. But I'm using official poky release from git so I
cannot cherry pick changes.
Or you have clone of poky repo and add changes on top from newest versions?
Yes but it's not an option
Thanks for sharing. But I'm using official poky release from git so I
cannot cherry pick changes.
Or you have clone of poky repo and add changes on top from newest versions?
Yes but it's not an option
|
By
Marek Belisko
·
#51354
·
|