|
Re: How to integrate kernel-module in yocto-dunfell?
#yocto
#dunfell
#apt
#tx2
#kernel
Hi Khem, thanks for your reply! Now I am a bit confused. Marek has send me another recipe:
Do you know if that is allready fixed for kernel 5,2+ ?
Best regards!
Hi Khem, thanks for your reply! Now I am a bit confused. Marek has send me another recipe:
Do you know if that is allready fixed for kernel 5,2+ ?
Best regards!
|
By
kilian.brandt@...
·
#50435
·
|
|
[meta-cgl][PATCH] pacemaker: Fix build with -fno-common
From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
Starting with GCC >= 10.x, -fno-common is used as default
instead of -fcommon.
Make the function definiton extern to fix the build failure.
Set the default
From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
Starting with GCC >= 10.x, -fno-common is used as default
instead of -fcommon.
Make the function definiton extern to fix the build failure.
Set the default
|
By
Yu, Mingli
·
#50434
·
|
|
Re: Query on building applications and catch exceptions across different shared libraries
OK please add it to your CXXFLAGS and see if it helps.
OK please add it to your CXXFLAGS and see if it helps.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#50433
·
|
|
Re: Query on building applications and catch exceptions across different shared libraries
No I am not using -fexceptions compiler flag .
Rgds
Simon
No I am not using -fexceptions compiler flag .
Rgds
Simon
|
By
SIMON BABY
·
#50432
·
|
|
Re: Query on building applications and catch exceptions across different shared libraries
are you using -fexceptions to compile your application ?
are you using -fexceptions to compile your application ?
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#50431
·
|
|
Query on building applications and catch exceptions across different shared libraries
Hello,
I have an issue with my throw , catch code in c++. If i throw an error after the openssl library call, my application crashes. If my application wishes to throw and catch exceptions across
Hello,
I have an issue with my throw , catch code in c++. If i throw an error after the openssl library call, my application crashes. If my application wishes to throw and catch exceptions across
|
By
SIMON BABY
·
#50430
·
|
|
Re: How to integrate kernel-module in yocto-dunfell?
#yocto
#dunfell
#apt
#tx2
#kernel
in this case you might be lucky we already have recipe
http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-extended/socketcan/can-isotp_git.bb?h=master
its blacklisted because it needs
in this case you might be lucky we already have recipe
http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-extended/socketcan/can-isotp_git.bb?h=master
its blacklisted because it needs
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#50429
·
|
|
Re: How to integrate kernel-module in yocto-dunfell?
#yocto
#dunfell
#apt
#tx2
#kernel
PLease take a look at :
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.6/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#working-with-out-of-tree-modules
where it is described how to compile out of tree modules.
marek
PLease take a look at :
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.6/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#working-with-out-of-tree-modules
where it is described how to compile out of tree modules.
marek
|
By
Marek Belisko
·
#50428
·
|
|
How to integrate kernel-module in yocto-dunfell?
#yocto
#dunfell
#apt
#tx2
#kernel
Hey community,
I'm trying to use this library [can-isotp][1] on a Jetson TX2 Board. The version of the running OS is: 0.0.8 (dunfell).
From the docs of the library I get the following
Hey community,
I'm trying to use this library [can-isotp][1] on a Jetson TX2 Board. The version of the running OS is: 0.0.8 (dunfell).
From the docs of the library I get the following
|
By
kilian.brandt@...
·
#50427
·
|
|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] scripts/send-qa-email: Update to dedicated push capable domain
Signed-off-by: Michael Halstead <mhalstead@...>
---
scripts/send-qa-email | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/send-qa-email
Signed-off-by: Michael Halstead <mhalstead@...>
---
scripts/send-qa-email | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/send-qa-email
|
By
Michael Halstead
·
#50426
·
|
|
Yocto Project Status WW35'20
Current Dev Position: YP 3.2 M3
Next Deadline: YP 3.2 M3 Feature Freeze - Now
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday Sept. 3rd at 7:30am PDT (https://zoom.us/j/454367603)
Monthly Project
Current Dev Position: YP 3.2 M3
Next Deadline: YP 3.2 M3 Feature Freeze - Now
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday Sept. 3rd at 7:30am PDT (https://zoom.us/j/454367603)
Monthly Project
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#50425
·
|
|
Re: Recipies version of incoming October Gatesgarth release.
I don't think any of us have crystal balls to predict the exact
package versions we'll be using in October for the next release. We're
close to the feature freeze point but high priority recipe
I don't think any of us have crystal balls to predict the exact
package versions we'll be using in October for the next release. We're
close to the feature freeze point but high priority recipe
|
By
Paul Barker
·
#50424
·
|
|
Recipies version of incoming October Gatesgarth release.
Hi,
Is there any way to know all the recipes version detail that will come with Yocto 3.2 Gatesgarth ??
Hi,
Is there any way to know all the recipes version detail that will come with Yocto 3.2 Gatesgarth ??
|
By
Yocto_user
·
#50423
·
|
|
Re: Information about Yocto Dunfell components version
#dunfell
<jester@...> wrote:
Also worth noting: The exact versions used will depend on which commit
from the dunfell branch you choose. You should follow updates to the
stable branch to get the
<jester@...> wrote:
Also worth noting: The exact versions used will depend on which commit
from the dunfell branch you choose. You should follow updates to the
stable branch to get the
|
By
Paul Barker
·
#50422
·
|
|
Re: Private: Re: [yocto] Information about Yocto Dunfell components version
#dunfell
Well if it's not there, then it's not there. If something is not provided by a recipe, then it obviously has no defined version. Please note though that package/recipe names are not directly
Well if it's not there, then it's not there. If something is not provided by a recipe, then it obviously has no defined version. Please note though that package/recipe names are not directly
|
By
Josef Holzmayr
·
#50421
·
|
|
Re: Information about Yocto Dunfell components version
#dunfell
Insert the package names into http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/dunfell/recipes and see for yourself :)
Greetz
Am Di., 1. Sept. 2020 um 12:22 Uhr schrieb Yocto_user
Insert the package names into http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/dunfell/recipes and see for yourself :)
Greetz
Am Di., 1. Sept. 2020 um 12:22 Uhr schrieb Yocto_user
|
By
Josef Holzmayr
·
#50420
·
|
|
Information about Yocto Dunfell components version
#dunfell
Hi All,
I read the Dunfell release notes but couldn't find the version detail of following components:
bzip2cairofaad2fontconfigfreetypegdkpixbuf
Hi All,
I read the Dunfell release notes but couldn't find the version detail of following components:
bzip2cairofaad2fontconfigfreetypegdkpixbuf
|
By
Yocto_user
·
#50419
·
|
|
[meta-gplv2] [PATCH] gnupg: Make it build with GCC 10 (which uses -fno-common by default)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@...>
---
...th-GCC-10-which-uses-fno-common-by-d.patch | 93 +++++++++++++++++++
recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_1.4.7.bb | 3 +-
2
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@...>
---
...th-GCC-10-which-uses-fno-common-by-d.patch | 93 +++++++++++++++++++
recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_1.4.7.bb | 3 +-
2
|
By
Peter Kjellerstedt
·
#50418
·
|
|
M+ & H bugs with Milestone Movements WW35
All,
YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW35 are listed below:
Priority
Bug ID
Short Description
Changer
Owner
Was
Became
High
13802
ltp tests fail with ssh connection
All,
YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW35 are listed below:
Priority
Bug ID
Short Description
Changer
Owner
Was
Became
High
13802
ltp tests fail with ssh connection
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#50417
·
|
|
Enhancements/Bugs closed WW35!
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
bruce.ashfield@...
4
richard.purdie@...
3
randy.macleod@...
2
joe.slater@...
1
Grand
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
bruce.ashfield@...
4
richard.purdie@...
3
randy.macleod@...
2
joe.slater@...
1
Grand
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#50416
·
|