Hi Ryan, I would suggest you to switch to GCC 9.2 Arm toolchain for Dunfell. RPB does the same [1]. GCCVERSION = "arm-9.2" [1]

I am successfully creating a root file-system for my project (roko version). I am interested in performing modifications to the root file-system after it has been constructed with a recipe. I

is gcc 8.3 the latest for linaro

Rob, I believe you are hitting a known bug: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13767 regards, Armin

Hello, I'm migrating from Warrior to Dunfell and I'm getting a curious build failure in gcc-sanitizers. Here's the full gory detail: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nh4cDKMvgS/ However, the main

Is there some magic to building the PDF versions of the yocto docs? I've tried on multiple machines running debian and differing versions of ubuntu and consistently the PDF docs fail to build. Font

Thanks for the prompt followup. Yeah, the two comments above are related in my nightmare so I'll address both of them together. vendor has layers that I am NOT modifying, and unfortunately I'm not

bitbake -e my-recipe ? Maybe grep for the variable of interest? When adding layers, only way to be sure is to actually review the layers and their bbappends. I tend to BBMASK everything out which I

Hi Robm For location of bbappends and recipes, etc.: bitbake-layers show-appends bitbake-layers show-recipes For variables: bitbake <recipe> -e | more and find the line starting with the variable

What I really need is information about introspection or the ability to query an existing yocto distro to return data about features included and more to the point, to understand EXACTLY where recipes

Hi Armin, So I found libmspack where you said it would be. I have done some more digging and talked to the Clamav developers. This line in the recipe (--with-system-libmspack=${CLAMAV_USR_DIR})

Hi Armin, yes. cu Adrian

Hi Richard, Yes, they are. My question was related to mtd recipe in OE-Core. Agree both are correct, but as you said, it can be more messy to maintain in external layers if it is not possible to

Adding patches in bbappends is always going to be high maintenance. Are these patches swupdate specific? The recipes use "git" in the filename and then set a sepcific SRCREV and set PV correctly.

Hi Zheng, I do not discuss abot the correctness of these patches (that I will aplly to meta-swupdate, -master), but about mtd-utils version (for this I pick up Richard in CC). There were in last

Hi Bruce, Sorry for late response. Due to something wrong of the mail server, I just see your email. I believe it can be applied successfully now. I find the file://CVE-2020-8551.patch

The selinux-init/autorelabel/labeldev services have a constraint of Before=sysinit.arget. So it is better to install them to sysinit.target rather than multi-user.target. Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao

Thanks Khem I guess the eSDK is quite new then. I have to ask my BSP supplier, about what version of Yocto they are using. "The extensible SDK can currently only be built for the same architecture

try to find where its being added. Perhaps bitbake -g <image> should give you dependency file where you can check where it appear on right hand side of -> and equate to which package is bringing it in

These are custom options perhaps you have from your SDK provider, since variscite SOMs are based on IMX perhaps you also need to see if they are using linux-imx kernel and ensure that they have