Thanks, that destinction makes it a lot clearer and sounds pretty clear to me. It also explains why we saw do_deploy a lot last week since we we're working with our bootloaders, which generally need

<oliver.westermann@...> wrote: you use do_install() to install any content that you need to be added to your rootfs/image, as you said. the content of $D will end up in a binary package (rpm,

If and only if the "custom" scripts are not clearly derived from otherwise licensed work that is. Clearly here means that you generally can include snippets from examples or existing scripts. I'm

I was asked by a colleague for the difference between do_deploy and do_install, which I both used mostly by checking similar recipes and copying their methods, but now I'm having some questions as

Hi, I'm trying to create an image recipe based on an existing one. I've searched online, and I could find such an example. My problem is that the image I what to serve as a base is changed in another

Hi Stephen, The link in your email points to the 2019 minutes, I think the current link is https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit. Thanks, Paul

fix build issue [v2] Fix subject line Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- .../ibmswtpm2/files/remove_optimization.patch | 26 ++++++++++++++++++

fixes: releated to issue: https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-tools/issues/1561 Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- .../recipes-tpm2/ibmswtpm2/ibmswtpm2_1332.bb | 24

fixes: releated to issue: https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-tools/issues/1561 Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/tpm2-tools/tpm2-tools_4.1.1.bb | 2 ++

clean up reciped. drop git fetching Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- .../{tpm2-tss_2.3.1.bb => tpm2-tss_2.3.2.bb} | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- .../files/fix_header_file.patch | 25 +++++++++++++++++ .../files/tpm2-get-caps-fixed.patch | 23 +++++++++++++++

moving on to the next nitpicky issue i want to clarify, and that's *precisely* how overrides and appends are combined. i'm looking at section 3.3 in the bitbake manual and i don't think the examples

clean up reciped. drop git fetching Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- .../{tpm2-tss_2.3.1.bb => tpm2-tss_2.3.2.bb} | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- .../files/fix_header_file.patch | 25 +++++++++++++++++ .../files/tpm2-get-caps-fixed.patch | 23 +++++++++++++++

On Sat, 8 Feb 2020, rpjday@... wrote: ... snip ... > which seems odd as there don't appear to be any other recipes that > provide pkgconfig, and AIUI, the default provider for any recipe

(part of the nitpickiness of some of these questions stems from that, in my updated courseware, i want to use actual examples out of, say, the openembedded layer, and not just contrived examples

On Sat, 8 Feb 2020, Jonatan Palsson wrote: .... snip ... > See the bottom example here: >

argh ... that is, of course, what i should have done first, just check the environment for the recipe. ok, that pretty much confirms that, barring some exceptional circumstances, most instances

Hello Robert & Leon, I had a look at the variable expansions bitbake -e. Here are two examples. The vim recipe uses "PROVIDES = xxd" (which would cause weird effects if = simply overwrote any

if that's true, then i've misunderstood it all this time. i guess i could always RTFS. rday