|
Re: linux-yocto: ktypes/tiny and some questions along the way
Heavily trimmed down to the remaining points of discussion...
Yes, sorry, I intended that, but didn't make that clear. Agreed.
Hrm, that's too bad. I really like the explicit coupling of the
Heavily trimmed down to the remaining points of discussion...
Yes, sorry, I intended that, but didn't make that clear. Agreed.
Hrm, that's too bad. I really like the explicit coupling of the
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#3833
·
|
|
Next steps on the Yocto Project's developer experience
Hello all – those of you who read our blog posts know that we are trying to continually improve our developer experience. I have some good news here.
I would like to introduce Belen Barros Pena
Hello all – those of you who read our blog posts know that we are trying to continually improve our developer experience. I have some good news here.
I would like to introduce Belen Barros Pena
|
By
David Stewart
·
#3832
·
|
|
Re: linux-yocto: ktypes/tiny and some questions along the way
There are configs that absolutely should be coupled with patches,
and configs that don't need to be. We are obviously talking about
configs that don't need to be, and we definitely have the
There are configs that absolutely should be coupled with patches,
and configs that don't need to be. We are obviously talking about
configs that don't need to be, and we definitely have the
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#3831
·
|
|
Re: linux-yocto: ktypes/tiny and some questions along the way
I'm seeing a problem with the coupling of patches and configs. I
understand why it made sense to do at the time, but if we want to base
all branches off the same sources (and it's clear we do) then
I'm seeing a problem with the coupling of patches and configs. I
understand why it made sense to do at the time, but if we want to base
all branches off the same sources (and it's clear we do) then
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#3830
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/1][KERNEL] meta: Add cedartrail
From: Rahul Saxena <rahul.saxena@...>
Add cedartrail.cfg, cedartrail.scc, cedartrail-standard.scc, cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena <rahul.saxena@.intel.com>
---
From: Rahul Saxena <rahul.saxena@...>
Add cedartrail.cfg, cedartrail.scc, cedartrail-standard.scc, cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena <rahul.saxena@.intel.com>
---
|
By
rahul.saxena@...
·
#3838
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/1][KERNEL] meta: Add cedartrail
From: Rahul Saxena <rahul.saxena@...>
This is the initial version of a BSP for the Cedar Trail platform.
The Cedar Trail platform consists of the Intel Cedarview Atom processor
and Tiger Point
From: Rahul Saxena <rahul.saxena@...>
This is the initial version of a BSP for the Cedar Trail platform.
The Cedar Trail platform consists of the Intel Cedarview Atom processor
and Tiger Point
|
By
rahul.saxena@...
·
#3837
·
|
|
Re: linux-yocto: ktypes/tiny and some questions along the way
Sorry for the slow reply, I got bogged down trying to write some
python code yesterday.
Sort of. Or what I meant by directly was the "patch <foo>" right
in standard.scc. As you well know, for the
Sorry for the slow reply, I got bogged down trying to write some
python code yesterday.
Sort of. Or what I meant by directly was the "patch <foo>" right
in standard.scc. As you well know, for the
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#3828
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/1] remove usbgadget from routerstationpro
Zumeng,
The comment from the bug reporter was also that the target
doesn't have USB slave hardware to support usbgadget. So mentioning
that in the header is probably a good idea as well.
And small
Zumeng,
The comment from the bug reporter was also that the target
doesn't have USB slave hardware to support usbgadget. So mentioning
that in the header is probably a good idea as well.
And small
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#3827
·
|
|
Re: kernel-tools failure for linux-yoctort_3.0.bb for poky/edison branch.
There's still a way it will work, merge_config.sh is only ever
called from the kern-tools. There shouldn't be any non kern-tools
calls to merge_config.sh, the error:
mv: cannot stat
There's still a way it will work, merge_config.sh is only ever
called from the kern-tools. There shouldn't be any non kern-tools
calls to merge_config.sh, the error:
mv: cannot stat
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#3826
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/1] remove usbgadget from routerstationpro
1. No mass storage needed to be accessed by usbgadget.
2. This is a router station & switch, so it should not
be taken as a USB_NET device too.
Signed-off-by: Zumeng.chen@...>
---
1. No mass storage needed to be accessed by usbgadget.
2. This is a router station & switch, so it should not
be taken as a USB_NET device too.
Signed-off-by: Zumeng.chen@...>
---
|
By
Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@...>
·
#3825
·
|
|
Package name in .bb file
Hello,
1- I wish to know how we are supposed to include package name in rootfs *.bb file?
Like if I have to include Qt-4.6.3 , which parameter from qt4-embedded_4.6.3.bb file I need to give
Hello,
1- I wish to know how we are supposed to include package name in rootfs *.bb file?
Like if I have to include Qt-4.6.3 , which parameter from qt4-embedded_4.6.3.bb file I need to give
|
By
Navani Kamal Srivastava <NAVANI.Srivastava@...>
·
#3829
·
|
|
Re: Using yocto/standard by default
Hrm maybe I missed that in the fri2 branches. It does need emgd, so I'll
double check that.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
Hrm maybe I missed that in the fri2 branches. It does need emgd, so I'll
double check that.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#3824
·
|
|
Re: kernel-tools failure for linux-yoctort_3.0.bb for poky/edison branch.
That won't work. He is using the latest kernel which has needs
merge_config.sh - as I ran into myself last week. I had Kishore
cherry-pick the last two patches to kern-tools-native from master
That won't work. He is using the latest kernel which has needs
merge_config.sh - as I ran into myself last week. I had Kishore
cherry-pick the last two patches to kern-tools-native from master
|
By
Darren Hart <darren.hart@...>
·
#3823
·
|
|
Re: Using yocto/standard by default
It's a valid config, and something that works now. So there's no
reason to not use it. New branches can be created IF a board really
does need to merge conflicting patches. The emgd stuff was a
It's a valid config, and something that works now. So there's no
reason to not use it. New branches can be created IF a board really
does need to merge conflicting patches. The emgd stuff was a
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#3822
·
|
|
Re: linux-libc-headers 2.6.37
What does your: meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc have
as the default ? It should be LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.1".
I'm talking about master for that default. In the release branches
it was
What does your: meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc have
as the default ? It should be LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.1".
I'm talking about master for that default. In the release branches
it was
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#3821
·
|
|
Re: kernel-tools failure for linux-yoctort_3.0.bb for poky/edison branch.
This is likely the problem. I use and test meta-kernel-dev everyday,
but that's always against master. I keep them in lockstep, since
meta-kernel-dev never really 'releases'.
That being said, we can
This is likely the problem. I use and test meta-kernel-dev everyday,
but that's always against master. I keep them in lockstep, since
meta-kernel-dev never really 'releases'.
That being said, we can
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#3820
·
|
|
Weekly Test Report for Yocto 1.2 M1 RC1 Build
Hi All,
This is the weekly test report for Yocto 1.2 M1 RC1 build. Test cases for new M1 features are included. HuronRiver is also added into BSP testing. There are 6 new bugs found in this
Hi All,
This is the weekly test report for Yocto 1.2 M1 RC1 build. Test cases for new M1 features are included. HuronRiver is also added into BSP testing. There are 6 new bugs found in this
|
By
Xu, Jiajun <jiajun.xu@...>
·
#3819
·
|
|
Re: Yocto Project community survey
Only 2 more days left to respond if you haven't, and then I'll quit bugging you. :)
Only 2 more days left to respond if you haven't, and then I'll quit bugging you. :)
|
By
Jeff Osier-Mixon <jefro@...>
·
#3818
·
|
|
Using yocto/standard by default
We hit another lock-step SRCREV bug earlier on the FRI2 BSP. This was
due mostly to my pushing the efi changes to meta-intel too early - but,
it highlights a maintenance step that I believe could be
We hit another lock-step SRCREV bug earlier on the FRI2 BSP. This was
due mostly to my pushing the efi changes to meta-intel too early - but,
it highlights a maintenance step that I believe could be
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#3817
·
|
|
Re: linux-libc-headers 2.6.37
This was on fri2 yocto/standard/fri2.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
This was on fri2 yocto/standard/fri2.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#3816
·
|