To be honest: I have forked meta-raspberrypi and don't use it any more. Just wanted to be a good boy. So maybe you want to send the revert here? Andreas

you need poky to build QEMUs and toolchains

2016-12-12 06:21 skrev Khem Raj:I think you should go even one step further and revert the entire commit merging this obsolete functionality: "git revert 4a4373c02d3d8355a2e5faa10af61450e5b093d8"

Does that work without poky? Philip

There is interest in the community to support building Zephyr images ( https://www.zephyrproject.org/ )in Yocto via bitbake recipes. AFAIK the only way thus far to build Zephyr images is based on

Superb, thanks! Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Can you build an application with out splitting the debug info. May be have toolchain on target and then compile a program natively and see if that works

Khem,

Ease-of-use is not necessarily determined by the complexity. Good integration and documentation can go a long way towards making a complex solution easy to use - when sticking to the pre-defined usage

Disable python support in gdb and compile it e.g.

Hi, I'm using a similar approach, but instead of using a separate "version package" I'm using the "BUILDNAME" and "DISTRO_VERSION" variables in my distro.conf. Then depending on how "large" the

Robert,

Current Dev Position: YP 2.3 M1 -> M2 Next Deadline: YP 2.3 M1 by Dec. 12, 2016 (TODAY!!) YP 2.3 M2 by Jan 23, 2017 SWAT team rotation: Tracy ->

When I did a research in update mechanism, mender wasn't yet available, and indeed it seems very straight forward (need to test it before final veredict). But if you compare SWUpdate, swupd, and

Which "getting started" document or presentation were you using? The documentation for mender (https://docs.mender.io/) is very straight-forward (partly of course because it doesn't need to cover

swupdate has support for a "dual copy strategy" (http://sbabic.github.io/swupdate/swupdate.html#software-collections) while out-of-the-box (i.e. with what is currently available) meta-swupd and swupd

I don’t think it’s possible for a version number to capture this at all. Better to use a script to capture the state of the system as needed. I.e. write build info to a file on target, and then

(if there's already a doc section for this somewhere, a pointer to it would be just ducky.) if one is building an image for a releasable, commercial product, and that image involves pulling in

Hi, It looks as if some highlights about swupdate can equally be said about swupd: - dual copy is supported - my minimal swupd-based rescue initramfs is around 4MB Cheers, Andre'