|
Re: Can't enable reverse debugging
By
Bryan Evenson
·
#33446
·
|
|
Re: Can't enable reverse debugging
Can you build an application with out splitting the debug info. May be have toolchain on target and then compile a program natively and see if that works
Can you build an application with out splitting the debug info. May be have toolchain on target and then compile a program natively and see if that works
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#33445
·
|
|
Re: Can't enable reverse debugging
Khem,
By
Bryan Evenson
·
#33444
·
|
|
Re: update mechanisms
Ease-of-use is not necessarily determined by the complexity. Good
integration and documentation can go a long way towards making a complex
solution easy to use - when sticking to the pre-defined usage
Ease-of-use is not necessarily determined by the complexity. Good
integration and documentation can go a long way towards making a complex
solution easy to use - when sticking to the pre-defined usage
|
By
Patrick Ohly
·
#33443
·
|
|
Re: Can't enable reverse debugging
Disable python support in gdb and compile it e.g.
Disable python support in gdb and compile it e.g.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#33442
·
|
|
Re: suggestions for version controlling multi-layer reproducible builds?
Hi,
I'm using a similar approach, but instead of using a separate "version
package" I'm using the "BUILDNAME" and "DISTRO_VERSION" variables in my
distro.conf.
Then depending on how "large" the
Hi,
I'm using a similar approach, but instead of using a separate "version
package" I'm using the "BUILDNAME" and "DISTRO_VERSION" variables in my
distro.conf.
Then depending on how "large" the
|
By
Richard Leitner
·
#33441
·
|
|
Re: suggestions for version controlling multi-layer reproducible builds?
Robert,
By
Bryan Evenson
·
#33440
·
|
|
Yocto Project Status WW51
Current Dev Position: YP 2.3 M1 -> M2
Next Deadline: YP 2.3 M1 by Dec. 12, 2016 (TODAY!!)
YP 2.3 M2 by Jan 23, 2017
SWAT team rotation: Tracy ->
Current Dev Position: YP 2.3 M1 -> M2
Next Deadline: YP 2.3 M1 by Dec. 12, 2016 (TODAY!!)
YP 2.3 M2 by Jan 23, 2017
SWAT team rotation: Tracy ->
|
By
Saul Wold <sgw@...>
·
#33439
·
|
|
Re: update mechanisms
When I did a research in update mechanism, mender wasn't yet available,
and indeed it seems very straight forward (need to test it before final
veredict). But if you compare SWUpdate, swupd, and
When I did a research in update mechanism, mender wasn't yet available,
and indeed it seems very straight forward (need to test it before final
veredict). But if you compare SWUpdate, swupd, and
|
By
Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@...>
·
#33438
·
|
|
Re: update mechanisms
Which "getting started" document or presentation were you using? The
documentation for mender (https://docs.mender.io/) is very
straight-forward (partly of course because it doesn't need to cover
Which "getting started" document or presentation were you using? The
documentation for mender (https://docs.mender.io/) is very
straight-forward (partly of course because it doesn't need to cover
|
By
Patrick Ohly
·
#33437
·
|
|
Re: update mechanisms
swupdate has support for a "dual copy
strategy" (http://sbabic.github.io/swupdate/swupdate.html#software-collections) while out-of-the-box (i.e. with what is currently available) meta-swupd and swupd
swupdate has support for a "dual copy
strategy" (http://sbabic.github.io/swupdate/swupdate.html#software-collections) while out-of-the-box (i.e. with what is currently available) meta-swupd and swupd
|
By
Patrick Ohly
·
#33436
·
|
|
Re: suggestions for version controlling multi-layer reproducible builds?
I don’t think it’s possible for a version number to capture this at all. Better to use a script to capture the state of the system as needed. I.e. write build info to a file on target, and then
I don’t think it’s possible for a version number to capture this at all. Better to use a script to capture the state of the system as needed. I.e. write build info to a file on target, and then
|
By
Christopher Larson <clarson@...>
·
#33435
·
|
|
suggestions for version controlling multi-layer reproducible builds?
(if there's already a doc section for this somewhere, a pointer to
it would be just ducky.)
if one is building an image for a releasable, commercial product,
and that image involves pulling in
(if there's already a doc section for this somewhere, a pointer to
it would be just ducky.)
if one is building an image for a releasable, commercial product,
and that image involves pulling in
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#33434
·
|
|
Re: update mechanisms
Hi,
It looks as if some highlights about swupdate can equally be said about
swupd:
- dual copy is supported
- my minimal swupd-based rescue initramfs is around 4MB
Cheers,
Andre'
Hi,
It looks as if some highlights about swupdate can equally be said about
swupd:
- dual copy is supported
- my minimal swupd-based rescue initramfs is around 4MB
Cheers,
Andre'
|
By
André Draszik <git@...>
·
#33433
·
|
|
Re: Can't enable reverse debugging
Khem,
By
Bryan Evenson
·
#33432
·
|
|
Re: update mechanisms
Compared to other update mechanism that I tested it was the easier to
implement.
Compared to other update mechanism that I tested it was the easier to
implement.
|
By
Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@...>
·
#33431
·
|
|
Re: Kernel config incremental modification not working.
We are already meeting to talk about this :D
Bruce
We are already meeting to talk about this :D
Bruce
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#33430
·
|
|
[PATCH v2] ref-manual: New WKS_FILE variable glossary entry.
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@...>
---
documentation/ref-manual/ref-variables.xml | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@...>
---
documentation/ref-manual/ref-variables.xml | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git
|
By
Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@...>
·
#33429
·
|
|
[meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 2/2] rpi-base.inc: remove input modules form XSERVER
This is nothing a BSP has to decide
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@...>
---
conf/machine/include/rpi-base.inc | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
This is nothing a BSP has to decide
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@...>
---
conf/machine/include/rpi-base.inc | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
|
By
Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@...>
·
#33428
·
|
|
[meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/2] rpi-base.inc: add xserver-xorg-extension-glx to XSERVER for vc4 enabled
make glxinfo/glggears/.. work
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@...>
---
conf/machine/include/rpi-base.inc | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
make glxinfo/glggears/.. work
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@...>
---
conf/machine/include/rpi-base.inc | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
|
By
Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@...>
·
#33427
·
|