|
Re: Truly scary SSL 3.0 vuln to be revealed soon:
There's a openssl 1.0.1j out now (fixing FOUR (!) CVEs, including
"disabling SSLv3 didn't work"...). I think considering the situation
we'd take the upgrade for dizzy, even though we've frozen.
There's a openssl 1.0.1j out now (fixing FOUR (!) CVEs, including
"disabling SSLv3 didn't work"...). I think considering the situation
we'd take the upgrade for dizzy, even though we've frozen.
|
By
Burton, Ross <ross.burton@...>
·
#21809
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] Truly scary SSL 3.0 vuln to be revealed soon:
Ross,
By
Bryan Evenson
·
#21807
·
|
|
Re: Truly scary SSL 3.0 vuln to be revealed soon:
Presumably the list of affected packages is:
- gnutls
- openssl
- nss
Are there more? Will ENEA be able to send patches to these packages?
Ross
Presumably the list of affected packages is:
- gnutls
- openssl
- nss
Are there more? Will ENEA be able to send patches to these packages?
Ross
|
By
Burton, Ross <ross.burton@...>
·
#21806
·
|
|
Truly scary SSL 3.0 vuln to be revealed soon:
Hi guys,
Yesterday The Register published this:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/14/nasty_ssl_30_vulnerability_to_drop_tomorrow/
and today following was
Hi guys,
Yesterday The Register published this:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/14/nasty_ssl_30_vulnerability_to_drop_tomorrow/
and today following was
|
By
Sona Sarmadi <sona.sarmadi@...>
·
#21805
·
|
|
Re: How to include static library and headers in sdk
It could be, that's largely up to how you want to package things for convenience.
Well, I'd hope that what we provide in the "Writing a new recipe" manual
section [1] should be helpful enough to get
It could be, that's largely up to how you want to package things for convenience.
Well, I'd hope that what we provide in the "Writing a new recipe" manual
section [1] should be helpful enough to get
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#21804
·
|
|
FW: [oss-security] Truly scary SSL 3.0 vuln to be revealed soon:
Hi all,
It seems that another vulnerability is coming soon, the advice is disable SSLv3.:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/14/nasty_ssl_30_vulnerability_to_drop_tomorrow/
From Hanno Böck
Hi all,
It seems that another vulnerability is coming soon, the advice is disable SSLv3.:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/14/nasty_ssl_30_vulnerability_to_drop_tomorrow/
From Hanno Böck
|
By
Sona Sarmadi <sona.sarmadi@...>
·
#21803
·
|
|
Adding nativesdk package to toolchain
Hello,
I am trying to add a nativesdk package of a custom recipe to toolchain in Poky-8.0.2. I have added nativesdk-qjson (custom package) to TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK variable, but it is throwing following
Hello,
I am trying to add a nativesdk package of a custom recipe to toolchain in Poky-8.0.2. I have added nativesdk-qjson (custom package) to TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK variable, but it is throwing following
|
By
Navani Srivastava <navani.srivastava@...>
·
#21802
·
|
|
[meta-oracle-java][PATCH]] Adding the jdk for arm. Version 1.7.0_u60
---
recipes-devtools/oracle-java/oracle-jse-jdk-arm_1.7.0.bb | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-devtools/oracle-java/oracle-jse-jdk-arm_1.7.0.bb
diff
---
recipes-devtools/oracle-java/oracle-jse-jdk-arm_1.7.0.bb | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-devtools/oracle-java/oracle-jse-jdk-arm_1.7.0.bb
diff
|
By
Kevin Vanden Berge <kevin@...>
·
#21808
·
|
|
[Package Report System]Manual check recipes name list
This mail was sent out by Package Report System.
It will list all the recipes which can't check upstream version by script, and will show how long it is since their last mannual version check.
You can
This mail was sent out by Package Report System.
It will list all the recipes which can't check upstream version by script, and will show how long it is since their last mannual version check.
You can
|
By
package-report@yoctoproject.org <packages@...>
·
#21801
·
|
|
[Package Report System]Upgrade recipes name list
This mail was sent out by Package Report System.
This message list those recipes which need to be upgraded. If maintainers believe some of them needn't to upgrade this time, they can fill in
This mail was sent out by Package Report System.
This message list those recipes which need to be upgraded. If maintainers believe some of them needn't to upgrade this time, they can fill in
|
By
package-report@yoctoproject.org <packages@...>
·
#21800
·
|
|
Re: Release Candidate Build for yocto-1.7.rc4 now available.
<pokybuild@...> wrote:
Beth,
I noticed that the Cc list for the original email looks to be corrupted:
Cc: ""@ossystems.com.bryi.zhao,
<pokybuild@...> wrote:
Beth,
I noticed that the Cc list for the original email looks to be corrupted:
Cc: ""@ossystems.com.bryi.zhao,
|
By
Paul Barker <paul@...>
·
#21799
·
|
|
Re: is anything happening with "meta-kernel-dev" layer?
I still use it every day, but it is being re-worked for 1.8. That being
said, the functionality that it added is largely present in core now,
and will be addressed by other developer workflow
I still use it every day, but it is being re-worked for 1.8. That being
said, the functionality that it added is largely present in core now,
and will be addressed by other developer workflow
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#21798
·
|
|
Release Candidate Build for yocto-1.7.rc4 now available.
-e
A release candidate build for yocto-1.7.rc4 is now available at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/yocto-1.7.rc4
Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible.
Build hash
-e
A release candidate build for yocto-1.7.rc4 is now available at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/yocto-1.7.rc4
Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible.
Build hash
|
By
Poky Build User <pokybuild@...>
·
#21797
·
|
|
PCEngines APU1c
Dear all,
May I know if anyone has a BSP for PCEngines APU1c ? Thanks.
Regards.
Dear all,
May I know if anyone has a BSP for PCEngines APU1c ? Thanks.
Regards.
|
By
Albert K <alberk@...>
·
#21796
·
|
|
is anything happening with "meta-kernel-dev" layer?
just noticed the entry at:
http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers
for
just noticed the entry at:
http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers
for
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#21795
·
|
|
Re: Cannot run simple binary executable file
I bought a Sam5d3 Xplained board and the os on it is 1.5.1 yocto project. I can see that under /lib folder there is only ld.linux.armhf.so, not ld linux.so, which is used by cross compile
I bought a Sam5d3 Xplained board and the os on it is 1.5.1 yocto project. I can see that under /lib folder there is only ld.linux.armhf.so, not ld linux.so, which is used by cross compile
|
By
Wy kevinthesun <kevinthesunwy@...>
·
#21794
·
|
|
Re: Cannot run simple binary executable file
Can you please explain how you got your "1.5.1 yocto system"? Did you built it
yourself or downloaded prebuilt from the site? If latter, then it should match
the toolchain...
Can you please explain how you got your "1.5.1 yocto system"? Did you built it
yourself or downloaded prebuilt from the site? If latter, then it should match
the toolchain...
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#21793
·
|
|
Re: Cannot run simple binary executable file
These errors occur when I add "-mfloat-abi=hardfp" to the toolchain setting. If I don't add it, no error occurs. Now I think the problem is that 1.5.1 or 1.6.2 toolchain doesn't support hard float,
These errors occur when I add "-mfloat-abi=hardfp" to the toolchain setting. If I don't add it, no error occurs. Now I think the problem is that 1.5.1 or 1.6.2 toolchain doesn't support hard float,
|
By
Wy kevinthesun <kevinthesunwy@...>
·
#21792
·
|
|
Re: Packaging foo required!
Of course not - the list wouldn't exist until after the recipe was run, so it's a chicken / egg problem ;-)
--
Chris Tapp
opensource@...
www.keylevel.com
----
You can tell you're getting
Of course not - the list wouldn't exist until after the recipe was run, so it's a chicken / egg problem ;-)
--
Chris Tapp
opensource@...
www.keylevel.com
----
You can tell you're getting
|
By
Chris Tapp
·
#21791
·
|
|
Re: Cannot run simple binary executable file
That doesn't sound like a toolchain error, but rather an autotools one. Make
sure you are setting up cross compilation properly.
That doesn't sound like a toolchain error, but rather an autotools one. Make
sure you are setting up cross compilation properly.
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#21790
·
|