Are you trying to use these layers with 1.6 / master? Until the devkit-daisy branch was pushed, the devkit was based on 1.5 (dora). If you get this error, it means there is a grub recipe but no

I looked back through this thread and the enhancement bug I filed (which for everyone but Richard seemed to be the way to go). The result was to reuse sstate, but I don't see how that can solve

Hello I am trying to build a simple recipe for a package called "pyotherside". It currently looks like this: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY =

I added meta-iot-devkit in to bblayers and when I bitbake iot-devkit-image (MACHINE=clanton, DISTRO=iot-devkit) I get orphaned bbappends. ERROR: No recipes available for:

Hi Gary, We don't support this usage at the moment in OE; if you use the OE toolchain we recommend you let the system build it, and it will then be restored from shared state for subsequent builds.

I made a complete copy of recipes-devtools/gcc before the original 4.8 recipes were added. Thanks for these pointers. I've given them a quick look and indeed they look manageable, so I'll probably

I think you should probably have meta-iot-devkit as well even if you don't use DISTRO = "iot-devkit". When you say "missing grub" can you be more specific about the error? Well, looking at the

Thanks Paul. Very useful, particularly the image creation incantations. I'll give this a go as soon as I can make some time. I really want to be building the same distro for multiple targets

So apologies for not replying earlier - I've not been directly involved in the BSP for Galileo, but I have been providing support for the team doing the IoT DevKit work. You should be able to build

Hi Ash, That's pretty much what I follow, although I try to avoid modifying recipes at all while there's a chance they might be built - recipes *do* get re-parsed during execution, not just when

Am 15.05.2014 22:43, schrieb Richard Purdie: Ah, really? So, "include" means, "if you find it then include it - if not, then doesn't matter"? Good to know :-) Thanks to everybody. I have it working

Hi, (apologies if this is the wrong list---I tried sending to the bitbake list and got bounced) Under what conditions can I change the content of layers without affecting an ongoing bitbake? On

glib-2.0: Update to match version in Poky Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-core/glib-2.0/glib-2.0_2.%.bbappend | 1 + recipes-core/glib-2.0/glib-2.0_2.38.2.bbappend

psmics: Update to match version in Poky and remove patch. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- .../psmisc/pstree-compiles-with-SE-Linux.patch | 265 ---------------------

swig: Update to latest swig from meta-openembedded Updated from: git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/swig As of commit

util-linux: Update package to match Poky master. Remove patch since it was merged upstream. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.23.2.bbappend

openssh: Use wildcard in version to minimize keeping in-sync with Poky Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh_6.%.bbappend | 11 +++++++++++

linux-kernel: Use wildcard in version to minimize keeping in-sync with Poky. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.%.bbappend | 7 +++++++

bind: Use wildcard to minimize the need to keep tp keep in-synx with Poky. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-connectivity/bind/bind_9.%.bbappend | 2 -- 1 file

bind: Use wildcard to minimize the need to keep in-sync with poky. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-connectivity/bind/bind_9.%.bbappend | 13 +++++++++++++