|
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto
My clone for meta-yocto is a bit old then, I checked this
explicitly and it isn't a separate repo for me at all, hence
why it's a single patch .. but wait. When I clone again from
poky.git, it's still
My clone for meta-yocto is a bit old then, I checked this
explicitly and it isn't a separate repo for me at all, hence
why it's a single patch .. but wait. When I clone again from
poky.git, it's still
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#1363
·
|
|
Re: Results of latest documentation audit, May 2011
I'm not particularly concerned about the kernel packages. I think we can ignore it. I'll update my script to not report these recipes.
The main goal is to ensure that man pages and the like are being
I'm not particularly concerned about the kernel packages. I think we can ignore it. I'll update my script to not report these recipes.
The main goal is to ensure that man pages and the like are being
|
By
Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@...>
·
#1362
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto
Bruce,
This need to be 2 pull requests, since the first 4 files are actually in meta-yotco, part of poky.git and the linux-yocto_git.bb is in OE-core
Please split this into 2 requests, one for
Bruce,
This need to be 2 pull requests, since the first 4 files are actually in meta-yotco, part of poky.git and the linux-yocto_git.bb is in OE-core
Please split this into 2 requests, one for
|
By
Saul Wold <sgw@...>
·
#1361
·
|
|
Re: Results of latest documentation audit, May 2011
I see "linux-*" in the list. What sort of documentation are we looking
for? The linux-image* packages in Ubuntu, for example, include a
changelog and a copyright.
Thanks,
--
Darren
--
Darren
I see "linux-*" in the list. What sort of documentation are we looking
for? The linux-image* packages in Ubuntu, for example, include a
changelog and a copyright.
Thanks,
--
Darren
--
Darren
|
By
Darren Hart <darren.hart@...>
·
#1360
·
|
|
Results of latest documentation audit, May 2011
Hello,
As a data point for where we stand in ensuring our packages are producing documentation, I have some scripts which build all recipes (using the output of bitbake -s, not world), and then check
Hello,
As a data point for where we stand in ensuring our packages are producing documentation, I have some scripts which build all recipes (using the output of bitbake -s, not world), and then check
|
By
Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@...>
·
#1359
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Add emenlow pieces removed from oe-core
Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
Pulled into meta-intel/master.
Thanks, Paul!
Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
Pulled into meta-intel/master.
Thanks, Paul!
|
By
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
·
#1358
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto
The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines
has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility
and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also
The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines
has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility
and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#1357
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto
The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines
has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility
and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also
The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines
has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility
and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#1356
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/1] Add emenlow pieces removed from oe-core
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@...>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@...>
---
.../recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools.bbappend | 2 ++
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@...>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@...>
---
.../recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools.bbappend | 2 ++
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#1355
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/1] Add emenlow pieces removed from oe-core
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@...>
This adds back the emenlow-specific pieces recently removed from oe-core.
Thanks,
Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@...>
---
Paul
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@...>
This adds back the emenlow-specific pieces recently removed from oe-core.
Thanks,
Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@...>
---
Paul
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#1354
·
|
|
Yocto weekly bug trend charts -- WW18
Hi all,
This is latest Yocto bug trend chart for WW18. The open bug number increased a lot from 182 to 185.
Best Regards,
Jiajun
Hi all,
This is latest Yocto bug trend chart for WW18. The open bug number increased a lot from 182 to 185.
Best Regards,
Jiajun
|
By
Xu, Jiajun <jiajun.xu@...>
·
#1385
·
|
|
[PATCH 3/3] linux-yocto: update SRCREVs
Updating the linux-yocto/2.6.37 SRCREVs to pickup:
perf tool: Fix gcc 4.6.0 issues
1/1 [
Author: Kyle McMartin
Email: kyle@...
Subject: perf tool: Fix gcc 4.6.0 issues
Updating the linux-yocto/2.6.37 SRCREVs to pickup:
perf tool: Fix gcc 4.6.0 issues
1/1 [
Author: Kyle McMartin
Email: kyle@...
Subject: perf tool: Fix gcc 4.6.0 issues
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#1353
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/3] linux-yocto: safely process unbranched repositories
The BSP bootstrap and -dev use cases can be applied against
unbranched or repos without meta data. To allow the proper
and safe processing of those repositories, slight modifications
to the tools are
The BSP bootstrap and -dev use cases can be applied against
unbranched or repos without meta data. To allow the proper
and safe processing of those repositories, slight modifications
to the tools are
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#1352
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto: apply meta data to external repos
To support quick uprev and testing, it is desireable to build
repositories that do not have embedded meta data. In this scenario
the meta data can be automatically created or provided externally.
This
To support quick uprev and testing, it is desireable to build
repositories that do not have embedded meta data. In this scenario
the meta data can be automatically created or provided externally.
This
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#1351
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/3] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request
Richard/Saul,
I've been running with these changes since before ELC, so they've had
some good soak time. The first two changes lay the ground for for some
1.1 functionality and are used by recipes in
Richard/Saul,
I've been running with these changes since before ELC, so they've had
some good soak time. The first two changes lay the ground for for some
1.1 functionality and are used by recipes in
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#1350
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Package exclusion
Hi Beth,
M1,
Yes there's definitely quite an overlap here and we should coordinate efforts.
Will catch you later on IRC to organise some time.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source
Hi Beth,
M1,
Yes there's definitely quite an overlap here and we should coordinate efforts.
Will catch you later on IRC to organise some time.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#1349
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Package exclusion
Most of the issues surrounding the license field is currently on my plate for M1.D
License tracking Build a parser to do license tracking more gracefully and make sure all recipes are correct. (takes
Most of the issues surrounding the license field is currently on my plate for M1.D
License tracking Build a parser to do license tracking more gracefully and make sure all recipes are correct. (takes
|
By
Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@...>
·
#1348
·
|
|
Re: OpenEmbedded eV membership drive
The TSC was asked by the board to figure out the details of the election
which we did in the first meeting as requested and provided our feedback
back to the board. The board naturally has the
The TSC was asked by the board to figure out the details of the election
which we did in the first meeting as requested and provided our feedback
back to the board. The board naturally has the
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#1347
·
|
|
Re: OpenEmbedded eV membership drive
2011/5/3 Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
I don't think it is up to the TSC to decide on the re-election timeframe. As it stands the TSC got a 2 month mandate. See the quote above (from Philip's
2011/5/3 Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...>
I don't think it is up to the TSC to decide on the re-election timeframe. As it stands the TSC got a 2 month mandate. See the quote above (from Philip's
|
By
Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@...>
·
#1346
·
|
|
Re: OpenEmbedded eV membership drive
The current situation was making the best of a bad set of circumstances,
the plan is to hold elections and nothing has changed in that regard.
This was discussed at the last TSC meeting and we
The current situation was making the best of a bad set of circumstances,
the plan is to hold elections and nothing has changed in that regard.
This was discussed at the last TSC meeting and we
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#1345
·
|