We have an RC3 which we feel confident in based on our no-nogo launch decision. However, there are a handful of issues which are not critical but would be desirable to address them - for example,

Saul and Richard and I put a plan together for this, will create a new thread for it.

Figured I should expand this.. Freescale MPC8315E-RDB (I think w/ have the 'A' revision, but thats not likely important)

arm - beagleboard (I don't know the revision) ppc - fsl-mpc8315e-rdb mips - Ubiquity Networks Router Station Pro a.k.a. MIPS Linux Starter Kit

OK, so can someone provide me with an appropriate list of the non-IA platforms? I know them as "The MIPS board" "The PPC board" etc. -- Darren Hart Embedded Linux Kernel

Apologies for the resend, sent from the wrong address and the list bounced it. Version 2 with some updates from Kevin, Dave, Tom, and Mark: Media Network Demo ================== The Yocto Project

Yeah, I think we should. It proves that it really does run on other hardware, and the demo hw is the example. Showing product names helps shake the image that this is IA-only. - A -- Alex

Hrm... do we want to explicitly call them out? The point is that it was multi-architecture, but for some to recreate it, the point is that it doesn't really matter what hardware they have - poky can

Richard, Here is an example of the do_fetch/do_unpack failure that I believe is representative of what Dirk saw and what I have been seeing periodically. I saw the following while building libproxy

/media/storage is the export location...

same here We won't have a bug free release. No one ever does. And any change increases the risk. So the question is "are they worth the added risk?". I believe the proposed changes address issues

I think this is much more appropriate for the wiki, anyway. -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center

At this point, the site map is set, and we're working with the web guys to set this up for review today and over the weekend. I'm loath to mess with the structure at this point, and adding something

Add a +1 to reviewed, worried, but accepting column. They each seem reasonable, low-enough risk.. --Mark

For the Future: Besides doing a basic build, we need to have some real unit tests for bitbake and the poky infrastructure, I guess I need to turn this into a Testing feature request for 1.0 (look for

I've looked over the changes and spent this afternoon testing them, I believe they are appropriate for the 0.9 release. Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre

I'm so predictable... :-) Yes, I'm nervous. I looked at all of the patches and with the exception of one or two, they mostly seem like good ones. I will accept these if Josh/Mark/Saul give us a +1 on

I think my build just has some stale data that the various cleans haven't cleared. I'm going to try some clean builds today. -- Darren Hart Embedded Linux Kernel

Coming up to release there are a few things that the extended testing has shown up which we have fixes for and which we should consider including in the release. I also finally got around to doing the

Hmm, I've commits to fix both of those issues in meta-demo master since at least yesterday morning.b Cool! Already done I'll take this AR I'll take this AR too I'll handle the Rygel and gupnp-av-cp