|
Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, November 27, 2012 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
Attendees:
Dave, MichaelH, Ciby, PaulE, ScottG, BjörnS, Ramana, KevinS, TomZ, Eren, AlexG, ALexD, Richard, BrianR,Jefro, LaurentiuP, Nitin, BruceA, RossB, ScottR, JeffP, MarkH, CristianI, DarrenH,
Attendees:
Dave, MichaelH, Ciby, PaulE, ScottG, BjörnS, Ramana, KevinS, TomZ, Eren, AlexG, ALexD, Richard, BrianR,Jefro, LaurentiuP, Nitin, BruceA, RossB, ScottR, JeffP, MarkH, CristianI, DarrenH,
|
By
Liu, Song <song.liu@...>
·
#10688
·
|
|
Re: IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow
for what it's worth, if you're building an image that's a variation
of a "core" image, an alternate way of adding packages after the fact
is:
CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL = "sysfsutils strace bash"
i
for what it's worth, if you're building an image that's a variation
of a "core" image, an alternate way of adding packages after the fact
is:
CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL = "sysfsutils strace bash"
i
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#10687
·
|
|
Re: Wiki Main page terrible sparse
Hi Jeff,
Sure :)
At first, I will try to address the suggestions of Alex along with other modifications based on our requirements.
I have checked the access rights and it works fine. Thanks!
Hi Jeff,
Sure :)
At first, I will try to address the suggestions of Alex along with other modifications based on our requirements.
I have checked the access rights and it works fine. Thanks!
|
By
Maxin John <Maxin.John@...>
·
#10686
·
|
|
Re: IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow
ah, quite so ... but it's still useful to note that the problem
extends even to the act of fetching. weird.
rday
--
ah, quite so ... but it's still useful to note that the problem
extends even to the act of fetching. weird.
rday
--
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#10685
·
|
|
Re: IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...> a écrit :
It's not fetched because the build system fails to see the new package
as a dependencie of the image so that's not a fetching issue but a
more
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...> a écrit :
It's not fetched because the build system fails to see the new package
as a dependencie of the image so that's not a fetching issue but a
more
|
By
Eric Bénard <eric@...>
·
#10684
·
|
|
Re: IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow
<rpjday@...> wrote:
Thank you for your testing and observations.
But I'd like to point out that in my tests, all the relevant files
have already been fetched. My DL_DIR already contains
<rpjday@...> wrote:
Thank you for your testing and observations.
But I'd like to point out that in my tests, all the relevant files
have already been fetched. My DL_DIR already contains
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#10683
·
|
|
Re: [oe] patchwork support for meta-freescale
<otavio@...> wrote:
These are hosted on different organizations... I don't see any repos
from git.yoctoproject.org on http://patches.openembedded.org/.
Although it would be nice to
<otavio@...> wrote:
These are hosted on different organizations... I don't see any repos
from git.yoctoproject.org on http://patches.openembedded.org/.
Although it would be nice to
|
By
McClintock Matthew-B29882 <B29882@...>
·
#10682
·
|
|
Re: IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow
here's a test i made based on nothing but fetching. using oe-core,
i selected qemuarm, added this line at the bottom of my local.conf:
IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " sysfsutils strace"
and ran
$
here's a test i made based on nothing but fetching. using oe-core,
i selected qemuarm, added this line at the bottom of my local.conf:
IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " sysfsutils strace"
and ran
$
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#10681
·
|
|
Re: Need for offline binary configuration
Looking for comments. Thanks
________________________________________
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 12:59 AM
To: Venkata ramana gollamudi
Cc: yocto@...; Sanil kumar; Hatle, Mark;
Looking for comments. Thanks
________________________________________
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 12:59 AM
To: Venkata ramana gollamudi
Cc: yocto@...; Sanil kumar; Hatle, Mark;
|
By
Venkata ramana gollamudi <ramana.gollamudi@...>
·
#10680
·
|
|
Re: IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow
Since it's confirmed from different people, I think it would be better to report
it using bugzilla. I guess that it's not an intended behaviour/feature of
bitbake. Please inform the bug number so that
Since it's confirmed from different people, I think it would be better to report
it using bugzilla. I guess that it's not an intended behaviour/feature of
bitbake. Please inform the bug number so that
|
By
Eren Türkay <eren@...>
·
#10679
·
|
|
Re: Preempt-rt kernel build for beagleboard
Correct. If you don't have any board specific patches, working with
an existing branch in the tree is fine.
Also note that the yocto-bsp tool allows the extension of an existing
BSP or kernel to a
Correct. If you don't have any board specific patches, working with
an existing branch in the tree is fine.
Also note that the yocto-bsp tool allows the extension of an existing
BSP or kernel to a
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#10674
·
|
|
[PATCH 4/4] Do not rely on AbstractHostShellOutputReader for waiting for command outputs
- AbstractHostShellReader is designed such that it will block in a read from the pipeline when the command is finished its execution, therefore we should not wait for this variable to be set because
- AbstractHostShellReader is designed such that it will block in a read from the pipeline when the command is finished its execution, therefore we should not wait for this variable to be set because
|
By
Ioana Grigoropol <ioanax.grigoropol@...>
·
#10678
·
|
|
[PATCH 3/4] Fix bitbake session by disabling sanity checks
- when creating a shell session for Bitbake, we cannot run "bitbake -e -b recipe.bb" just by setting DISABLE_SANITY_CHECKS=1; we must first append DISABLE_SANITY_CHECKS to
- when creating a shell session for Bitbake, we cannot run "bitbake -e -b recipe.bb" just by setting DISABLE_SANITY_CHECKS=1; we must first append DISABLE_SANITY_CHECKS to
|
By
Ioana Grigoropol <ioanax.grigoropol@...>
·
#10677
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/4] Fix md5sum & sha256sum pattern checks
Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol <ioanax.grigoropol@...>
---
.../ui/wizards/NewBitBakeFileRecipeWizardPage.java | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol <ioanax.grigoropol@...>
---
.../ui/wizards/NewBitBakeFileRecipeWizardPage.java | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
|
By
Ioana Grigoropol <ioanax.grigoropol@...>
·
#10676
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/4] Fix remote deletion of files
- when deleting a file from a remote directory use the URI and not the location of the file which is null
Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol <ioanax.grigoropol@...>
---
- when deleting a file from a remote directory use the URI and not the location of the file which is null
Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol <ioanax.grigoropol@...>
---
|
By
Ioana Grigoropol <ioanax.grigoropol@...>
·
#10675
·
|
|
Re: Forcing native binaries to build as 32-bit on a 64-bit host OS?
Sorry for the delay in replying. I've not had to do this myself but I suspect
something like this might do it:
BUILD_ARCH = "i686"
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology
Sorry for the delay in replying. I've not had to do this myself but I suspect
something like this might do it:
BUILD_ARCH = "i686"
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#10673
·
|
|
Re: IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow
Jonas Jonsson L <jonas.l.jonsson@...> a écrit :
that seems to work the first time you add something using
IMAGE_INSTALL_append.
Then it fails when you add packages later (bitbake wants to
Jonas Jonsson L <jonas.l.jonsson@...> a écrit :
that seems to work the first time you add something using
IMAGE_INSTALL_append.
Then it fails when you add packages later (bitbake wants to
|
By
Eric Bénard <eric@...>
·
#10672
·
|
|
Re: IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow
I can also confirm this.
A package (I've tried with diffutils & bash) must be built separately before it's added to an image via IMAGE_INSTALL_append.
/Jonas - fetched poky today
I can also confirm this.
A package (I've tried with diffutils & bash) must be built separately before it's added to an image via IMAGE_INSTALL_append.
/Jonas - fetched poky today
|
By
Jonas Jonsson L <jonas.l.jonsson@...>
·
#10671
·
|
|
Re: IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow
Thank you, Eric, for the confirmation.
Just to clarify for anyone following along: the problem isn't with
bash or trace-cmd themselves. If I perform the same steps but use
'bash' first, then
Thank you, Eric, for the confirmation.
Just to clarify for anyone following along: the problem isn't with
bash or trace-cmd themselves. If I perform the same steps but use
'bash' first, then
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#10670
·
|
|
Re: IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow
Hi Trevor,
Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> a écrit :
I confirm the problem when following this procedure step by step.
with bitbake -e we see that bash is in RDEPENDS and in IMAGE_INSTALL
with
Hi Trevor,
Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> a écrit :
I confirm the problem when following this procedure step by step.
with bitbake -e we see that bash is in RDEPENDS and in IMAGE_INSTALL
with
|
By
Eric Bénard <eric@...>
·
#10669
·
|