Re: [meta-tensorflow][PATCH 8/25] tensorflow-estimator: 1.13 -> 2.4
Marek Belisko
Hi Randy,
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:47 PM Randy MacLeod <randy.macleod@...> wrote: I have done some small changes and now have tensorflow from master working on top of dunfell. Would you be interested in sharing changes back and integrate to repo? Thanks and BR, marek
|
|
#yocto #armv6 #raspberrypi #neon
#raspberrypi
#neon
#yocto
#armv6
safouane maaloul
Hello folks, i am trying to compile my image but we could see that i am missing neon fpu in my image. I can't use this feature because i have a raspberry pi zero w and i have armv6 on this raspberrypi. I noticed that we don't the neon feature on armv6 so i wish that you can help me to find a work around this problem. Thanks in advance.
Best regards, Safouane this is an exemple of the error i get when i run the build : | In file included from /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/aom/2.0.0-r0/git/av1/encoder/arm/neon/quantize_neon.c:12: | /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/aom/2.0.0-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi/10.2.0/include/arm_neon.h:10373:1: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' 'vld1q_s32': target specific option mismatch
| 10373 | vld1q_s32 (const int32_t * __a)
| | ^~~~~~~~~
| In file included from /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/aom/2.0.0-r0/git/av1/encoder/arm/neon/quantize_neon.c:20:
| /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/aom/2.0.0-r0/git/av1/common/arm/mem_neon.h:525:24: note: called from here
| 525 | const int32x4_t v0 = vld1q_s32(buf);
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
| WARNING: /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/aom/2.0.0-r0/temp/run.do_compile.11087:155 exit 1 from 'eval ${DESTDIR:+DESTDIR=${DESTDIR} }VERBOSE=1 cmake --build '/workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/aom/2.0.0-r0/build' "$@" -- ${EXTRA_OECMAKE_BUILD}'
| WARNING: Backtrace (BB generated script):
| #1: cmake_runcmake_build, /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/aom/2.0.0-r0/temp/run.do_compile.11087, line 155
| #2: cmake_do_compile, /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/aom/2.0.0-r0/temp/run.do_compile.11087, line 149
| #3: do_compile, /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/aom/2.0.0-r0/temp/run.do_compile.11087, line 144
| #4: main, /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/aom/2.0.0-r0/temp/run.do_compile.11087, line 168
|
| Backtrace (metadata-relative locations):
| #1: cmake_runcmake_build, /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/../../poky/meta/classes/cmake.bbclass, line 205
| #2: cmake_do_compile, /workdir/tep-cam-rpi-yocto/rpi-build-gatesgarth/../../poky/meta/classes/cmake.bbclass, line 209
| #3: do_compile, autogenerated, line 2
|
|
Re: insmod - huawei E3372h kernel module
Zoltan Kerenyi Nagy
Hi,
If I intentionally typo in the defconfig file: USB_NET_HUAWEI_CDC_NCM_cat=y USB_NET_DRIVERS=y USB_USBNET=y The bitbake -f linux command doesn't recognize the change. It means to me that any change in this will not have an effect. -- Zolee
|
|
Re: Points to consider while moving to new yocto versions
Hi,
My comments are in-line On 25/01/2021 10:07, amaya jindal wrote: Hi All,I would consider it "best practice" to somewhat try to stay up to date with recent yocto versions and plan for this from the beginning of your project. What I mean is to have a "stable release" and a "next release" which is being used in your nightly builds and tests. This will make it significantly easier to make version upgrades. We are not thinking to move to gates-garth or some other major release but the releases than can have easily support for arm.I am not sure what you mean by that? Which versions make it easier/more difficult to support arm? It's more a question of which chip/kernel/boot loader,... Please support and help.Ssince you use a completely outdated and end of life version[1] it might require quite some effort to update, but through pain we learn ;) [1] https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases Which chip do you use? Is it supported by an upstream kernel/boot loader? Which (additional) layers do you use? Are these layers supported by the same version as the Yocto version you want to move to? How about your own recipes? Are they compatible with upstream yocto? Regards,Regards, Robert
|
|
Re: NPM Fetcher & License collection in Yocto Zeus
Oliver Westermann
Hey,
I figured to squeeze in a test and it seems that this is solved in Dunfell, at least I can’t trigger it even when trying and the folder structure used in the work directory has changed -> No issues there I guess.
For Zeus: I’ve checked
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/log/?h=zeus and it seems that there are no new commits. From
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases zeus is in the Community phase.
Best regards, Olli
Von: Jean-Marie Lemetayer <jeanmarie.lemetayer@...>
Hi Olivier,
Thanks for your implication :)
I think the modification you want to make resides in the npm class file:
But, starting with dunfell, the npm related mechanism have been reworked and also the npm class:
Is it possible to test if you have the same issue with dunfell ?
Best Regards, Jean-Marie
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:00 AM Oliver Westermann <oliver.westermann@...> wrote:
Hey,
|
|
Re: Points to consider while moving to new yocto versions
Erik Boto
Hi,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I'd start by looking at the relevant documentation section, https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#general-migration-considerations. There you can also find a per-release summary of changes that are worth knowing when moving to that release. Moving from krogoth to e.g. gatesgarth is quite a jump, so I'd expect that it might require some effort. If you don't intend to follow along new version, you might want to consider using dunfell which is the current LTS version. Cheers, Erik
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:07 AM amaya jindal <amayajindal786@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.3_M2.rc1)
Sangeeta Jain
Hi all,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.3_M2.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle: OEQA-manual tests for following module: 1. OE-Core 2. BSP-hw Runtime auto test for following platforms: 1. MinnowTurbot 32-bit 2. Coffee Lake 3. NUC 7 4. NUC 6 5. Edgerouter 6. Beaglebone ETA for completion is next Thursday, January 28. Thanks, Sangeeta
-----Original Message-----
|
|
Points to consider while moving to new yocto versions
amaya jindal
Hi All, We are planning to move to New yocto from current one that is krogoth yocto to some updated one. We are not thinking to move to gates-garth or some other major release but the releases than can have easily support for arm. Please support and help. Points need to take care to port to new yocto version. Regards, Rohit
|
|
Re: Writing a BSP from downstream kernel sources
Diego Santa Cruz
From: yocto@... <yocto@...>
On Behalf Of Jonas Vautherin via lists.yoctoproject.org
Sent: 24 January 2021 14:30 To: Jonas Vautherin <jonas.vautherin@...> Cc: Paul Barker <pbarker@...>; Yocto-mailing-list <yocto@...> Subject: Re: [yocto] Writing a BSP from downstream kernel sources
Just to close this: it seems like the gcc-cross-arm used by yocto gatesgarth is too new for that specific downstream kernel (3.18.31).
The goal was to get a proper BSP package for this device for a modern yocto, so I don't think I will try with an older version of Yocto. If I compile an old gcc as part of a custom Yocto layer (on gatesgarth), I am guessing that I will have issues creating a distro that runs both on RPi and on that older device (because RPi will have a newer kernel and gcc, and the skycontroller will use older ones). I also guess that the downstream dts won't work with a modern kernel, and I would not know how to write one myself for that apq8009 chip.
Hence, I'm giving up. Thanks a lot for the help :-). [Diego Santa Cruz] Wait! You may be able to get it working, see below.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jonas Vautherin via lists.yoctoproject.org <jonas.vautherin=gmail.com@...> wrote:
|
|
FW: JFFS2 File system support
sharmila.d@...
Hi, I am using TI based processor for our custom project. We are using NAND as our Boot media. The type of the File system we opted is JFFS2. The following lines I have added in my machine configuration file for creating jffs2 root file system.
IMAGE_FSTYPES += "jffs2 tar.xz" EXTRA_IMAGECMD_jffs2 = "-lnp -e 0x20000 -s 2048"
The system is hanging during the boot. It is actually getting stuck in below message
systemd-journald[75]: Received request to flush runtime journal from PID 1
I have attached my dmesg log FYR.
Thank you,
With Best Regards, Sharmila D
|
|
Hi,
Please see my comments in-line. On 24/01/2021 22:09, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2021, Monsees, Steven C (US) via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:I assume your sources are in /ede/tms/yocto/zeus/downloads/I added the following to my local.conf: Can you please try without the PATH at the end? The manual does not mention anything like PATH at the end[1] I do expose my per site premirror via a web server to all the machines like this: SOURCE_MIRROR_URL = "http://mirror/source_mirror_gatesgarth" [1] https://docs.yoctoproject.org/singleindex.html#term-SOURCE_MIRROR_URL Regards,not sure why that wouldn't work, it's what i've used for years. Robert
|
|
Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021, Monsees, Steven C (US) via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
I added the following to my local.conf:not sure why that wouldn't work, it's what i've used for years. rday
|
|
Monsees, Steven C (US)
I am trying to setup PREMIRRORS to setup and point to the directory containing all the tar-balls for my build… I was under the impression that the “
I added the following to my local.conf:
INHERIT += "own-mirrors" SOURCE_MIRROR_URL = “file:///ede/tms/yocto/zeus/downloads/PATH”
But this does not appear to retrieve the tar-balls from from my local repository…
What is the proper syntax required to setup PREMIRRORS to point to and use my local repo ?
Thanks, Steve
|
|
Re: Writing a BSP from downstream kernel sources
Jonas Vautherin
Just to close this: it seems like the gcc-cross-arm used by yocto gatesgarth is too new for that specific downstream kernel (3.18.31). The goal was to get a proper BSP package for this device for a modern yocto, so I don't think I will try with an older version of Yocto. If I compile an old gcc as part of a custom Yocto layer (on gatesgarth), I am guessing that I will have issues creating a distro that runs both on RPi and on that older device (because RPi will have a newer kernel and gcc, and the skycontroller will use older ones). I also guess that the downstream dts won't work with a modern kernel, and I would not know how to write one myself for that apq8009 chip. Hence, I'm giving up. Thanks a lot for the help :-).
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jonas Vautherin via lists.yoctoproject.org <jonas.vautherin=gmail.com@...> wrote:
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH] linux-yocto: Remove Rock Pi 4 patch for serial
Joshua Watt
Upstream OE Core has moved to Kernel 5.10 which fixed this problem, so
remove the patch for 5.8 Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@...> --- ...-resolve-supply-after-creating-regul.patch | 53 ------------------- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.8.bbappend | 4 -- 2 files changed, 57 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/0001-Revert-regulator-resolve-supply-after-creating-regul.patch delete mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.8.bbappend diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/0001-Revert-regulator-resolve-supply-after-creating-regul.patch b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/0001-Revert-regulator-resolve-supply-after-creating-regul.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 3dd336b..0000000 --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/0001-Revert-regulator-resolve-supply-after-creating-regul.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,53 +0,0 @@ -From a414d39b848002e15531f2538d2b6427ce51d07d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@...> -Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:59:47 -0600 -Subject: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator" - -This commit prevents the serial console from working on the Rock Pi 4 -for some reason. It *appears* to possibly be fixed by some other commit -upstream, but after a lot of head scratching and bisecting, I was unable -to find which one, so just revert it for now and we can deal with it -later. - -This reverts commit 96c6b5d5775637b3095ef934f871044811fd4db7. - ---- - drivers/regulator/core.c | 21 ++++++++------------- - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c -index 25e601bf9383..be8c709a7488 100644 ---- a/drivers/regulator/core.c -+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c -@@ -5187,20 +5187,15 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc, - else if (regulator_desc->supply_name) - rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name; - -+ /* -+ * Attempt to resolve the regulator supply, if specified, -+ * but don't return an error if we fail because we will try -+ * to resolve it again later as more regulators are added. -+ */ -+ if (regulator_resolve_supply(rdev)) -+ rdev_dbg(rdev, "unable to resolve supply\n"); -+ - ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev, constraints); -- if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { -- /* Regulator might be in bypass mode and so needs its supply -- * to set the constraints */ -- /* FIXME: this currently triggers a chicken-and-egg problem -- * when creating -SUPPLY symlink in sysfs to a regulator -- * that is just being created */ -- ret = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev); -- if (!ret) -- ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev, constraints); -- else -- rdev_dbg(rdev, "unable to resolve supply early: %pe\n", -- ERR_PTR(ret)); -- } - if (ret < 0) - goto wash; - --- -2.29.2 - diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.8.bbappend b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.8.bbappend deleted file mode 100644 index 5a31842..0000000 --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.8.bbappend +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4 +0,0 @@ -FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:" - -SRC_URI_append_rock-pi-4 = " file://0001-Revert-regulator-resolve-supply-after-creating-regul.patch" - -- 2.30.0
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH] rock-pi-4: Split our variant machines
Joshua Watt
Splits out the three variants of the rock-pi-4 (A, B & C) into their own
machines. Unfortunately, it is not possible to have a single machine that works for all three, as there isn't any known ways for the bootloader to distinguish them. Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@...> --- conf/machine/include/rk3399.inc | 2 +- conf/machine/{rock-pi-4.conf => include/rock-pi-4.inc} | 8 ++------ conf/machine/rock-pi-4a.conf | 8 ++++++++ conf/machine/rock-pi-4b.conf | 8 ++++++++ conf/machine/rock-pi-4c.conf | 8 ++++++++ 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) rename conf/machine/{rock-pi-4.conf => include/rock-pi-4.inc} (68%) create mode 100644 conf/machine/rock-pi-4a.conf create mode 100644 conf/machine/rock-pi-4b.conf create mode 100644 conf/machine/rock-pi-4c.conf diff --git a/conf/machine/include/rk3399.inc b/conf/machine/include/rk3399.inc index 4019988..f6b7826 100644 --- a/conf/machine/include/rk3399.inc +++ b/conf/machine/include/rk3399.inc @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ SOC_FAMILY = "rk3399" DEFAULTTUNE ?= "cortexa72-cortexa53-crypto" -require conf/machine/include/tune-cortexa72-cortexa53.inc require conf/machine/include/soc-family.inc +require conf/machine/include/tune-cortexa72-cortexa53.inc require conf/machine/include/rockchip-defaults.inc KBUILD_DEFCONFIG ?= "defconfig" diff --git a/conf/machine/rock-pi-4.conf b/conf/machine/include/rock-pi-4.inc similarity index 68% rename from conf/machine/rock-pi-4.conf rename to conf/machine/include/rock-pi-4.inc index 5231abf..7a98063 100644 --- a/conf/machine/rock-pi-4.conf +++ b/conf/machine/include/rock-pi-4.inc @@ -1,15 +1,11 @@ # Copyright (C) 2020 Garmin Ltd. or its subsidaries # Released under the MIT license (see COPYING.MIT for the terms) -#@TYPE: Machine -#@NAME: Rock Pi 4 RK3399 -#@DESCRIPTION: Rock Pi 4 is a Raspberry Pi 4 Alternative based on Rockchip RK3399 Processor. +# Add a common override for all Rock Pi 4 machines +MACHINEOVERRIDES =. "rock-pi-4:" require conf/machine/include/rk3399.inc -KERNEL_DEVICETREE = "rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtb" -UBOOT_MACHINE = "rock-pi-4-rk3399_defconfig" - RK_BOOT_DEVICE = "mmcblk1" WKS_FILE ?= "rock-pi-4.wks" IMAGE_FSTYPES += "wic wic.bmap" diff --git a/conf/machine/rock-pi-4a.conf b/conf/machine/rock-pi-4a.conf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9f3aa5a --- /dev/null +++ b/conf/machine/rock-pi-4a.conf @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +#@TYPE: Machine +#@NAME: Rock Pi 4A RK3399 +#@DESCRIPTION: Rock Pi 4 is a Raspberry Pi 4 Alternative based on Rockchip RK3399 Processor. + +require conf/machine/include/rock-pi-4.inc + +KERNEL_DEVICETREE = "rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4a.dtb" +UBOOT_MACHINE = "rock-pi-4-rk3399_defconfig" diff --git a/conf/machine/rock-pi-4b.conf b/conf/machine/rock-pi-4b.conf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..033c063 --- /dev/null +++ b/conf/machine/rock-pi-4b.conf @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +#@TYPE: Machine +#@NAME: Rock Pi 4B RK3399 +#@DESCRIPTION: Rock Pi 4 is a Raspberry Pi 4 Alternative based on Rockchip RK3399 Processor. + +require conf/machine/include/rock-pi-4.inc + +KERNEL_DEVICETREE = "rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4b.dtb" +UBOOT_MACHINE = "rock-pi-4-rk3399_defconfig" diff --git a/conf/machine/rock-pi-4c.conf b/conf/machine/rock-pi-4c.conf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9e9bbbb --- /dev/null +++ b/conf/machine/rock-pi-4c.conf @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +#@TYPE: Machine +#@NAME: Rock Pi 4C RK3399 +#@DESCRIPTION: Rock Pi 4 is a Raspberry Pi 4 Alternative based on Rockchip RK3399 Processor. + +require conf/machine/include/rock-pi-4.inc + +KERNEL_DEVICETREE = "rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4c.dtb" +UBOOT_MACHINE = "rock-pi-4c-rk3399_defconfig" -- 2.30.0
|
|
Re: Writing a BSP from downstream kernel sources
Jonas Vautherin
Thanks a lot for the answer! It seems like using `KCONFIG_MODE = "--alldefconfig"` with `KBUILD_DEFCONFIG = "msm8909_defconfig"` now ends up with the same kind of errors as when I use the defconfig from the downstream kernel [1], i.e.: ``` | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s: Assembler messages: | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s:985: Error: .err encountered ``` Could it be related to the tuning, e.g. I'm somehow defining a wrong toolchain in my machine configuration [2] and it fails to build? I was thinking about the tune-cortexa7.inc include, though it seems to me that the apq8009 is a cortexa7 [3]: > The Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 is an entry level SoC for Android based tablets and smartphones. It contains four ARM Cortex-A7 CPU cores (quad core) [2]: https://github.com/JonasVautherin/meta-skycontroller3/blob/main/conf/machine/skycontroller3.conf#L32 [3]: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-212-APQ8009-SoC-Benchmarks-and-Specs.169859.0.html Best,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 11:06 AM Paul Barker <pbarker@...> wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 02:29, Jonas Vautherin <jonas.vautherin@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Writing a BSP from downstream kernel sources
On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 02:29, Jonas Vautherin <jonas.vautherin@...> wrote:
I think setting `KBUILD_DEFCONFIG = "msm8909_defconfig"` is likely the correct approach here. What you may be missing though is the correct value for KCONFIG_MODE. By default, the supplied defconfig file is copied to .config but dependencies between config options aren't resolved. You need to set `KCONFIG_MODE = "--alldefconfig"` to get the equivalent of `make msm8909_defconfig` to occur. See https://github.com/agherzan/meta-raspberrypi/blob/master/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi.inc#L19 for an idea of how this is done for Raspberry Pi. Thanks, -- Paul Barker Konsulko Group
|
|
Writing a BSP from downstream kernel sources
Jonas Vautherin
As a learning experience, I am trying to create a BSP for a device I own and whose downstream kernel is published. The device in question is the Parrot Skycontroller3, and the sources are available here. Let me start by sharing my issue. When I build the kernel with `bitbake virtual/kernel`, it fails with errors like: ``` | AS arch/arm/lib/backtrace.o | AS arch/arm/lib/bswapsdi2.o | AS arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.o | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s: Assembler messages: | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s:985: Error: .err encountered | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s:1033: Error: .err encountered | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s:6812: Error: .err encountered ``` I created it getting inspiration from meta-raspberrypi and meta-qti-bsp, which seems to have the same CPU: apq8009. According to the Parrot sources, my device runs a Qualcomm apq8009/msm89090 cpu. In my repo, I use as a defconfig file the linux.config that is available in the Parrot sources (I copied it in my kernel recipe under `files/defconfig` and added it to SRC_URI). The Parrot sources also refer to `LINUX_DEFAULT_CONFIG_TARGET := msm8909_defconfig`, so I tried to set `KBUILD_DEFCONFIG = "msm8909_defconfig"`, but that is failing with different errors, such as: ``` error: 'VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT'? ``` or ``` error: 'L_PTE_YOUNG' undeclared ``` As a side note, their `drivers/Kconfig` seemed invalid, so I patched it. I am a bit lost now, not completely sure where my issues come from. I realize that changing the defconfig has quite some impact (I get different errors), and also that my machine configuration may be completely wrong (I am essentially guessing from the fact that it is an apq8009/msm8909, but for instance the tuning I just copied from meta-qti-bsp, which may be invalid). I would be glad if I could get hints about debugging this. Again, it is really a learning project: I would like to learn how to create a BSP from a downstream kernel. Best,
|
|
Re: OpenEmbedded Virtual Stand at FOSDEM 2021
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 11:02, Robert Berger@...
<robert.berger.yocto.user@...> wrote: I'd say video content for FOSDEM should be around the level of the things we'd show on the stand, short demos or introductions which can be understood by people not too familiar with the details of the project. I'm going to record a short "Introducing OpenEmbedded" presentation based around the way I usually pitch the project to folks who turn up at our FOSDEM stand and ask what the project is about. I may also do a quick build & boot demo with a Raspberry Pi if I have time to record that. Thanks, -- Paul Barker Konsulko Group
|
|