Date   

Yocto Project Virtual Summit 2020 - CFP Open

Reyna, David
 

Hello all!
 
Yocto Project is pleased to announce the Yocto Project Virtual Summit 2020, a technical conference for engineers, open source technologists, students and academia in the OSS space. 
 
Organized in conjunction with ELCE 2020, this 2-day event is where individuals will learn about Yocto Project’s direction — including, but not limited to, new releases, development tools, features — get training on the next wave of embedded Linux technologies, and network with their industry peers, Yocto Project maintainers and experts.
FORMAT: The class will be presented in Zoom. It will be highly interactive with experienced teachers from around the world, and includes chat sessions, side rooms, teaching assistants, and hands-on exercises with live class accounts.
1)  Yocto Project Virtual Summit
 
DATE: Thursday, October 29 and Friday, October 30, 2020
TIME: 12.00PM-GMT to 8.00PM-GMT (5AM to 1PM in PST time, 8AM-4PM in EDT time, 5.30PM-1.30AM in India), as per ELCE
LOCATION: Zoom
COST: $40 USD
REGISTRATION: Go to the ELCE registration site and add Yocto Project Summit as part of your registration (when the extra events become available)
 
2) Yocto Project Virtual Summit - Call For Papers (CFP)
 
The CFP is now open. Become a presenter yourself and share your expertise!
CFP Closes: 11:59 PM PST on Monday, September 21, 2020
CFP Notifications: Monday, September 28, 2020
Slide Due Date: Monday, October 26, 2020
 
 
CFP list of sample topics:
  • DevTool
  • Layer quality: e.g. creating robust layers, safely using existing layers
  • Future languages (e.g. Rust)
  • Productivity tricks and tools, Best Practices
  • VS Code integration
  • Security
  • Reproducibility
  • Init systems: pros and cons, selection, configuration
  • Leveraging the new runqueue optimizations for mirrors, reproducible builds
  • Supporting the Application Developer
  • DevOps, CI/CD
  • Containers, VMs
  • Working with/creating BSPs
  • Practical use of the Yocto Project
 
Best regards,
Yocto Project Advocacy Team
 
If you have any questions or issues, contact us at: conferences@...
 
 
 
 
 
 


Yocto Project Virtual Summit 2020 - CFP Open

Reyna, David
 

Hello all!
 
Yocto Project is pleased to announce the Yocto Project Virtual Summit 2020, a technical conference for engineers, open source technologists, students and academia in the OSS space. 
 
Organized in conjunction with ELCE 2020, this 2-day event is where individuals will learn about Yocto Project’s direction — including, but not limited to, new releases, development tools, features — get training on the next wave of embedded Linux technologies, and network with their industry peers, Yocto Project maintainers and experts.
FORMAT: The class will be presented in Zoom. It will be highly interactive with experienced teachers from around the world, and includes chat sessions, side rooms, teaching assistants, and hands-on exercises with live class accounts.
1)  Yocto Project Virtual Summit
 
DATE: Thursday, October 29 and Friday, October 30, 2020
TIME: 12.00PM-GMT to 8.00PM-GMT (5AM to 1PM in PST time, 8AM-4PM in EDT time, 5.30PM-1.30AM in India), as per ELCE
LOCATION: Zoom
COST: $40 USD
REGISTRATION: Go to the ELCE registration site and add Yocto Project Summit as part of your registration (when the extra events become available)
 
2) Yocto Project Virtual Summit - Call For Papers (CFP)
 
The CFP is now open. Become a presenter yourself and share your expertise!
CFP Closes: 11:59 PM PST on Monday, September 21, 2020
CFP Notifications: Monday, September 28, 2020
Slide Due Date: Monday, October 26, 2020
 
 
CFP list of sample topics:
  • DevTool
  • Layer quality: e.g. creating robust layers, safely using existing layers
  • Future languages (e.g. Rust)
  • Productivity tricks and tools, Best Practices
  • VS Code integration
  • Security
  • Reproducibility
  • Init systems: pros and cons, selection, configuration
  • Leveraging the new runqueue optimizations for mirrors, reproducible builds
  • Supporting the Application Developer
  • DevOps, CI/CD
  • Containers, VMs
  • Working with/creating BSPs
  • Practical use of the Yocto Project
 
Best regards,
Yocto Project Advocacy Team
 
If you have any questions or issues, contact us at: conferences@...
 
 
 
 
 
 


Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for September 1, 2020

Trevor Woerner
 

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for September 1, 2020
archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit

== disclaimer ==
Best efforts are made to ensure the below is accurate and valid. However,
errors sometimes happen. If any errors or omissions are found, please feel
free to reply to this email with any corrections.

== attendees ==
Trevor Woerner, Stephen Jolly, Jan-Simon Möller, Alejandro H, Bruce
Ashfield, Armin Kuster, Richard Purdie, David Reyna, Steve Sakoman, Michael
Halstead, Ross Burton, Paul Barker, Mark Morton, Scott Murray, Jeremy
Puhlman, Joshua Watt, Jon Mason, Randy MacLeod

== notes ==
- entered m3 feature freeze
- working on a couple patches for 3.2
- bitbake server startup changed to avoid recently discovered issues will wait
for 3.3 to make default
- one more round of recipe upgrades before m3 build (later this week)
- -fno-common back to gcc10 default
- still some AB issues
- looking for help with unassigned bugs

== general ==
RP: list of 3.2 things:
Mark’s hash equivalency prserv fix
RP: where are we with bind?
Armin: haven’t gotten around to sending them
RP: please do so
RP: want to get more of the AUH upgrades in too.
RP: Alex has queued up the rest.
RP: high priority bitbake bug on startup that needs to go in
docs changes, we want to cut over to sphinx before m3

TrevorW: what’s the -fno-common issue?
RP: gcc changed defaults with gcc10, caused namespaces to overlap (and code
builds to fail), we temporarily switched away from the new default, waited
for upstream and created patches, now we can switch back to gcc10’s
default

Joshua: what still needs to be done with the docs?
RP: check Nico’s doc. right now: mostly marking up the code sections. please
coordinate on the mailing list

PaulB: will be giving a talk at the upcoming Linaro Connect on license
compliance with Yocto, Linaro Connect (virtual) is supposed to be free to
attend this year

RP: i’ve heard that YP was mentioned at last week’s Plumbers, does anyone
know when/where it could have been mentioned?
(various): not sure
Scott: I don’t see Khem here, maybe he was talking about it?
TrevorW: Alistair Francis is a contributor to YP and RISC-V, it could have
been brought up in relation to that. the RISC-V YP BSP carries a lot of
patches

Randy: Saul Wold is joining WR today!
RP: glad to hear he’s returning to YP


Re: RootFS Size increase during Migration

Khem Raj
 

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:18 PM Aashik Aswin <thisisaash9698@...> wrote:

Hi Developers,

I am migrating my code from Yocto Thud (4.19) Kernel to Yocto Zeus (5.4) Kernel.

The recipes and conf files are essentially the same, but I am seeing a substantial increase in the RootFS Size and Subsequent final image size (Close to 40 MB).

Any idea on how we can debug this or where we can start for inspecting why the image size increase.
Enable buildhistory in both builds
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/3.1/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#enabling-and-disabling-build-history
once you have it enabled build the images (assuming you are building
in two different workspaces ) you can diff installed-package-sizes.txt
from two builds
and it should give you some hints, if you are switching the build in
same workspace between two releases then you can do two builds and
inside buildhistory
folder run git show cmd which should show you delta between last two builds

Thanks,
Aashik


RootFS Size increase during Migration

Aashik Aswin
 

Hi Developers,

I am migrating my code from Yocto Thud (4.19) Kernel to Yocto Zeus (5.4) Kernel.

The recipes and conf files are essentially the same, but I am seeing a substantial increase in the RootFS Size and Subsequent final image size (Close to 40 MB).

Any idea on how we can debug this or where we can start for inspecting why the image size increase.

Thanks,
Aashik


Error while building dahdi-linux along with Rocko Yocto #yocto #rocko #dahdi

@prashant2314
 

Hi,

I'm using Rocko yocto for my project, in this when I'm including dahdi-linux I'm getting unneeded files error.

Error logs:    

ERROR: dahdi-linux-3.1.0-r0 do_package: QA Issue: dahdi-linux: Files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:  
  /usr/lib    
  /usr/lib/hotplug    
  /usr/lib/hotplug/firmware    
  /lib/firmware    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-te133.bin    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-tc400m.bin    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-oct6114-256.bin    
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-oct6114-032-1.05.01    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-te436.bin    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-a8b.bin    
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-tc400m-MR6.12    
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-a8a-1d0017    
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-a8b-1f001e    
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-hx8-2.06    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-te435.bin    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-hx8.bin    
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-te436-10017    
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-te820-1.76    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-te820.bin    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-te134.bin    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-a4a.bin    
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-te435-13001e    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-a8a.bin    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-oct6114-128.bin    
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-oct6114-064-1.05.01     
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-oct6114-064.bin     
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-te133-7a001e    
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-vpmoct032-1.12.0     
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-a4a-a0017     
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-oct6114-128-1.05.01     
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-oct6114-256-1.05.01     
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-oct6114-032.bin     
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-vpmoct032.bin     
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-a4b-d001e    
  /lib/firmware/dahdi-fw-a4b.bin
  /lib/firmware/.dahdi-fw-te134-780017    

**Please set FILES such that these items are packaged. Alternatively if they are unneeded, avoid installing them or delete them within do_install.**     
dahdi-linux: 36 installed and not shipped files. [installed-vs-shipped]    
ERROR: dahdi-linux-3.1.0-r0 do_package: Fatal QA errors found, failing task.    
ERROR: dahdi-linux-3.1.0-r0 do_package: Function failed: do_package    
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /home/prashant/P_DIALT/RENESAS/RZ_G2E    /Yocto_for_experiments/rzg2_bsp/build/tmp/work/ek874-poky-linux/dahdi-linux/3.1.0-r0/temp/log.do_package.9978    
ERROR: Task (/home/prashant/P_DIALT/RENESAS/RZ_G2E/Yocto_for_experiments/rzg2_bsp/build/../meta-telephony/recipes-isdn/dahdi-linux/dahdi-linux_3.1.0.bb:do_package) failed with exit code '1'    
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 4969 tasks of which 4968 didn't need to be rerun and 1 failed.  
    I've tried these method also    
    "https://www.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2016-January/028127.html"    
    "https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49748528/yocto-files-directories-were-installed-but-not-shipped-in-any-package"  
   in **dahdi-linux_3.1.0.bb** file, then also I'm facing same issue.    
please assist me to solve this.   

Regard,    
Prashant Singh


Re: How to integrate kernel-module in yocto-dunfell? #yocto #dunfell #apt #tx2 #kernel

Marek Belisko
 

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 8:56 AM <kilian.brandt@...> wrote:

Hi Khem, thanks for your reply! Now I am a bit confused. Marek has sent me another recipe:
Shared recipe should be the same as one from meta-oe :). So you can
include it in your image and it should be build then.

LICENSE = "GPLv2"

LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=72d977d697c3c05830fdff00a7448931"

SRCREV = "6003f9997587e6a563cebf1f246bcd0eb6deff3d"

PV = "1.0+git${SRCPV}"



SRC_URI = "git://github.com/hartkopp/can-isotp.git;protocol=https"



S = "${WORKDIR}/git"



inherit module



EXTRA_OEMAKE += "KERNELDIR=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}"


Do you know if that is allready fixed for kernel 5,2+ ?

Best regards!

BR,

marek

--
as simple and primitive as possible
-------------------------------------------------
Marek Belisko - OPEN-NANDRA
Freelance Developer

Ruska Nova Ves 219 | Presov, 08005 Slovak Republic
Tel: +421 915 052 184
skype: marekwhite
twitter: #opennandra
web: http://open-nandra.com


Re: How to integrate kernel-module in yocto-dunfell? #yocto #dunfell #apt #tx2 #kernel

kilian.brandt@...
 

Hi Khem, thanks for your reply! Now I am a bit confused. Marek has send me another recipe:

 LICENSE = "GPLv2"

LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=72d977d697c3c05830fdff00a7448931"

SRCREV = "6003f9997587e6a563cebf1f246bcd0eb6deff3d"

PV = "1.0+git${SRCPV}"

 

SRC_URI = "git://github.com/hartkopp/can-isotp.git;protocol=https"

 

S = "${WORKDIR}/git"

 

inherit module

 

EXTRA_OEMAKE += "KERNELDIR=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}"


Do you know if that is allready fixed for kernel 5,2+ ?

Best regards!


[meta-cgl][PATCH] pacemaker: Fix build with -fno-common

Yu, Mingli
 

From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>

Starting with GCC >= 10.x, -fno-common is used as default
instead of -fcommon.

Make the function definiton extern to fix the build failure.

Set the default OCF_ROOT_DIR to $libdir/ocf to make the
resource agents components more compatible.

Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
---
.../0001-Mark-declaration-with-extern.patch | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
...maker-set-OCF_ROOT_DIR-to-libdir-ocf.patch | 32 +++++++++++++
.../recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker_2.0.3.bb | 2 +
3 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker/0001-Mark-declaration-with-extern.patch
create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker/0001-pacemaker-set-OCF_ROOT_DIR-to-libdir-ocf.patch

diff --git a/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker/0001-Mark-declaration-with-extern.patch b/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker/0001-Mark-declaration-with-extern.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5729447
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker/0001-Mark-declaration-with-extern.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+From e1abd3b7c7a0122813e4d0abdb079df10104882c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
+Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 04:44:09 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] Mark declaration with extern
+
+Fixes build with gcc 10+
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
+---
+ daemons/attrd/pacemaker-attrd.h | 4 ++--
+ daemons/execd/pacemaker-execd.h | 2 +-
+ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/daemons/attrd/pacemaker-attrd.h b/daemons/attrd/pacemaker-attrd.h
+index cc8e29ee1..76778915e 100644
+--- a/daemons/attrd/pacemaker-attrd.h
++++ b/daemons/attrd/pacemaker-attrd.h
+@@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ typedef struct attribute_value_s {
+ gboolean seen;
+ } attribute_value_t;
+
+-crm_cluster_t *attrd_cluster;
+-GHashTable *attributes;
++extern crm_cluster_t *attrd_cluster;
++extern GHashTable *attributes;
+
+ #define attrd_send_ack(client, id, flags) \
+ crm_ipcs_send_ack((client), (id), (flags), "ack", __FUNCTION__, __LINE__)
+diff --git a/daemons/execd/pacemaker-execd.h b/daemons/execd/pacemaker-execd.h
+index 4a52d9183..dab3ccdbe 100644
+--- a/daemons/execd/pacemaker-execd.h
++++ b/daemons/execd/pacemaker-execd.h
+@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
+ # include <gnutls/gnutls.h>
+ # endif
+
+-GHashTable *rsc_list;
++extern GHashTable *rsc_list;
+
+ typedef struct lrmd_rsc_s {
+ char *rsc_id;
+--
+2.26.2
+
diff --git a/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker/0001-pacemaker-set-OCF_ROOT_DIR-to-libdir-ocf.patch b/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker/0001-pacemaker-set-OCF_ROOT_DIR-to-libdir-ocf.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ff9c7d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker/0001-pacemaker-set-OCF_ROOT_DIR-to-libdir-ocf.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+From 3ca78a6441eefc26f18211375b18205ed6fc28c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
+Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:26:36 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] pacemaker: set OCF_ROOT_DIR to $libdir/ocf
+
+* Set the default OCF_ROOT_DIR to $libdir/ocf
+ to make the resource agents components more
+ compatible
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
+---
+ configure.ac | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
+index 58d39cdc0..eb4275560 100644
+--- a/configure.ac
++++ b/configure.ac
+@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ dnl This defaults to /usr/lib rather than libdir because it's determined by the
+ dnl OCF project and not pacemaker. Even if a user wants to install pacemaker to
+ dnl /usr/local or such, the OCF agents will be expected in their usual
+ dnl location. However, we do give the user the option to override it.
+-OCF_ROOT_DIR="/usr/lib/ocf"
++OCF_ROOT_DIR="$libdir/ocf"
+ AC_ARG_WITH([ocfdir],
+ [AS_HELP_STRING([--with-ocfdir=DIR],
+ [OCF resource agent root directory (advanced option: changing this may break other cluster components unless similarly configured) @<:@/usr/lib/ocf@:>@])],
+--
+2.26.2
+
diff --git a/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker_2.0.3.bb b/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker_2.0.3.bb
index 9b63acd..56f3bc4 100644
--- a/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker_2.0.3.bb
+++ b/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/pacemaker/pacemaker_2.0.3.bb
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ DEPENDS = "corosync libxslt libxml2 gnutls resource-agents libqb python3-native"
SRC_URI = "git://github.com/ClusterLabs/${BPN}.git \
file://0006-Fix-tools-Fix-definition-of-curses_indented_printf.patch \
file://0001-Fix-python3-usage.patch \
+ file://0001-Mark-declaration-with-extern.patch \
+ file://0001-pacemaker-set-OCF_ROOT_DIR-to-libdir-ocf.patch \
file://volatiles \
file://tmpfiles \
"
--
2.26.2


Re: Query on building applications and catch exceptions across different shared libraries

Khem Raj
 

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:06 PM SIMON BABY <simonkbaby@...> wrote:

No I am not using -fexceptions compiler flag .
OK please add it to your CXXFLAGS and see if it helps.


Rgds
Simon

On Wednesday, September 2, 2020, Khem Raj <raj.khem@...> wrote:

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:18 PM SIMON BABY <simonkbaby@...> wrote:

Hello,

I have an issue with my throw , catch code in c++. If i throw an error after the openssl library call, my application crashes. If my application wishes to throw and catch exceptions across different shared libraries do we have any specific settings I can add in my bitbake recipe?
are you using -fexceptions to compile your application ?

regards
Simon


Re: Query on building applications and catch exceptions across different shared libraries

SIMON BABY
 

No I am not using -fexceptions compiler flag .

Rgds
Simon


On Wednesday, September 2, 2020, Khem Raj <raj.khem@...> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:18 PM SIMON BABY <simonkbaby@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an issue with my throw , catch code in c++.  If i throw an error after the openssl library call, my application crashes.  If my application wishes to throw and catch exceptions across different shared libraries do we have any specific settings I can add in my bitbake recipe?
>

are you using -fexceptions to compile your application ?

> regards
> Simon
>


Re: Query on building applications and catch exceptions across different shared libraries

Khem Raj
 

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:18 PM SIMON BABY <simonkbaby@...> wrote:

Hello,

I have an issue with my throw , catch code in c++. If i throw an error after the openssl library call, my application crashes. If my application wishes to throw and catch exceptions across different shared libraries do we have any specific settings I can add in my bitbake recipe?
are you using -fexceptions to compile your application ?

regards
Simon


Query on building applications and catch exceptions across different shared libraries

SIMON BABY
 

Hello,

I have an issue with my throw , catch code in c++.  If i throw an error after the openssl library call, my application crashes.  If my application wishes to throw and catch exceptions across different shared libraries do we have any specific settings I can add in my bitbake recipe?

regards
Simon


Re: How to integrate kernel-module in yocto-dunfell? #yocto #dunfell #apt #tx2 #kernel

Khem Raj
 

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:32 AM Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@...> wrote:

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:13 PM <kilian.brandt@...> wrote:

Hey community,

I'm trying to use this library [can-isotp][1] on a Jetson TX2 Board. The version of the running OS is: 0.0.8 (dunfell).

From the docs of the library I get the following instructions:

```

DOWNLOAD and BUILD

1. Download repository and enter the repositories root directory

git clone https://github.com/hartkopp/can-isotp.git

cd can-isotp

2. Build ISO-TP kernel module

Ensure build dependencies are installed. E.g. for Debian (or Ubuntu):

sudo apt-get install build-essential linux-headers-$(uname -r)

To build:

(you need to be in the repositories root path)

make

To install (optional):

sudo make modules_install


3. When the PF_CAN core module is loaded ('modprobe can') the ISO-TP module
can be loaded into the kernel with

insmod ./net/can/can-isotp.ko

When the can-isotp.ko module has been installed into the Linux Kernels
modules directory (e.g. with 'make modules_install') the module should
load automatically when opening a CAN_ISOTP socket.

```

I have some questions about that procedure. Can anybody give me an hint on how to install this module? Do I have to create a completly new yocto image or is there any way to install kernel modules afterwards? I tried to copy the folder onto the TX2 and install it by hand, but (as to be expected) the make command is not found.
PLease take a look at :
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.6/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#working-with-out-of-tree-modules
where it is described how to compile out of tree modules.
in this case you might be lucky we already have recipe
http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-extended/socketcan/can-isotp_git.bb?h=master
its blacklisted because it needs work to fix build on 5.2+ kernel

I would really appreciate any help ! Best regards,


[1]: https://github.com/hartkopp/can-isotp
marek


Re: How to integrate kernel-module in yocto-dunfell? #yocto #dunfell #apt #tx2 #kernel

Marek Belisko
 

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:13 PM <kilian.brandt@...> wrote:

Hey community,

I'm trying to use this library [can-isotp][1] on a Jetson TX2 Board. The version of the running OS is: 0.0.8 (dunfell).

From the docs of the library I get the following instructions:

```

DOWNLOAD and BUILD

1. Download repository and enter the repositories root directory

git clone https://github.com/hartkopp/can-isotp.git

cd can-isotp

2. Build ISO-TP kernel module

Ensure build dependencies are installed. E.g. for Debian (or Ubuntu):

sudo apt-get install build-essential linux-headers-$(uname -r)

To build:

(you need to be in the repositories root path)

make

To install (optional):

sudo make modules_install


3. When the PF_CAN core module is loaded ('modprobe can') the ISO-TP module
can be loaded into the kernel with

insmod ./net/can/can-isotp.ko

When the can-isotp.ko module has been installed into the Linux Kernels
modules directory (e.g. with 'make modules_install') the module should
load automatically when opening a CAN_ISOTP socket.

```

I have some questions about that procedure. Can anybody give me an hint on how to install this module? Do I have to create a completly new yocto image or is there any way to install kernel modules afterwards? I tried to copy the folder onto the TX2 and install it by hand, but (as to be expected) the make command is not found.
PLease take a look at :
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.6/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#working-with-out-of-tree-modules
where it is described how to compile out of tree modules.

I would really appreciate any help ! Best regards,


[1]: https://github.com/hartkopp/can-isotp
marek


How to integrate kernel-module in yocto-dunfell? #yocto #dunfell #apt #tx2 #kernel

kilian.brandt@...
 

Hey community, 

I'm trying to use this library [can-isotp][1] on a Jetson TX2 Board. The version of the running OS is: 0.0.8 (dunfell). 
 
From the docs of the library I get the following instructions:
 
```
DOWNLOAD and BUILD

1. Download repository and enter the repositories root directory

      git clone https://github.com/hartkopp/can-isotp.git

      cd can-isotp

2. Build ISO-TP kernel module

   Ensure build dependencies are installed. E.g. for Debian (or Ubuntu):

      sudo apt-get install build-essential linux-headers-$(uname -r)

   To build:

      (you need to be in the repositories root path)

      make

   To install (optional):

      sudo make modules_install


3. When the PF_CAN core module is loaded ('modprobe can') the ISO-TP module
   can be loaded into the kernel with

       insmod ./net/can/can-isotp.ko

   When the can-isotp.ko module has been installed into the Linux Kernels
   modules directory (e.g. with 'make modules_install') the module should
   load automatically when opening a CAN_ISOTP socket.
```

I have some questions about that procedure. Can anybody give me an hint on how to install this module? Do I have to create a completly new yocto image or is there any way to install kernel modules afterwards? I tried to copy the folder onto the TX2 and install it by hand, but (as to be expected) the make command is not found. 

I would really appreciate any help ! Best regards, 
 
 
  [1]: https://github.com/hartkopp/can-isotp


[PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] scripts/send-qa-email: Update to dedicated push capable domain

Michael Halstead
 

Signed-off-by: Michael Halstead <mhalstead@...>
---
scripts/send-qa-email | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/send-qa-email b/scripts/send-qa-email
index abc17e2..f38c876 100755
--- a/scripts/send-qa-email
+++ b/scripts/send-qa-email
@@ -70,10 +70,10 @@ if 'poky' in repos and os.path.exists(resulttool) and args.results_dir:
elif basebranch:
cloneopts = ["--branch", basebranch]
try:
- subprocess.check_call(["git", "clone", "git@...:yocto-testresults", tempdir, "--depth", "5"] + cloneopts)
+ subprocess.check_call(["git", "clone", "git@...:yocto-testresults", tempdir, "--depth", "5"] + cloneopts)
except subprocess.CalledProcessError:
print("No comparision branch found, falling back to master")
- subprocess.check_call(["git", "clone", "git@...:yocto-testresults", tempdir, "--depth", "5"])
+ subprocess.check_call(["git", "clone", "git@...:yocto-testresults", tempdir, "--depth", "5"])

# If the base comparision branch isn't present regression comparision won't work
# at least until we can tell the tool to ignore internal branch information
--
2.26.2


Yocto Project Status WW35'20

Stephen Jolley
 

Current Dev Position: YP 3.2 M3

Next Deadline: YP 3.2 M3 Feature Freeze - Now

 

Next Team Meetings:

 

Key Status/Updates:

  • M3 has now closed and we’re at feature freeze for 3.2.
  • There are a number of patches we need for 3.2 which are still being sorted out and M3 will build once that has happened.
  • Bitbake server startup has been changed to avoid the issues previously discovered. There are some issues with traceback handling/reporting during early init which are being resolved as a result of that and those have open bugs.
  • The server changes have improved memory resident bitbake but some issues with state tracking still remain so memory resident bitbake will not be the default until 3.3, assuming we can debug those remaining problems by early in 3.3.
  • There has been work in enabling PRServ to work well with hash equivalence, thanks to Mark for sorting out this long standing work item. We aim to have this in 3.2 but some tests need fixing before it can completely merge.
  • We will process one last round of recipe upgrades before we build M3.
  • We were finally able to change the fcommon gcc defaults back to standard, thanks to all who helped make that happen.
  • The number of autobuilder intermittent bugs has continued to rise unfortunately.

You can see the list of failures we’re continuing to see by searching for the “AB-INT” tag in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=AB-INT

Help with any of these would be much appreciated, unfortunately it is proving hard to find anyone interested in helping figure these out and they significantly hamper our testing.

 

YP 3.2 Milestone Dates:

  • YP 3.2 M3 build date 2020/8/31
  • YP 3.2 M3 Release date 2020/9/11
  • YP 3.2 M4 build date 2020/10/5
  • YP 3.2 M4 Release date 2020/10/30

 

Planned upcoming dot releases:

  • YP 3.1.3 build date 2020/9/14
  • YP 3.1.3 release date 2020/9/25

 

Tracking Metrics:

 

The Yocto Project’s technical governance is through its Technical Steering Committee, more information is available at:

https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/TSC

 

The Status reports are now stored on the wiki at: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Weekly_Status

 

[If anyone has suggestions for other information you’d like to see on this weekly status update, let us know!]

 

Thanks,

 

Stephen K. Jolley

Yocto Project Program Manager

(    Cell:                (208) 244-4460

* Email:              sjolley.yp.pm@...

 


Re: Recipies version of incoming October Gatesgarth release.

 

On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 13:16, Yocto_user <avinashyadav94it@...> wrote:

Hi,
Is there any way to know all the recipes version detail that will come with Yocto 3.2 Gatesgarth
I don't think any of us have crystal balls to predict the exact
package versions we'll be using in October for the next release. We're
close to the feature freeze point but high priority recipe updates
could still be taken after that time.

Why do you think you need this information? If you explain your
concerns hopefully we can find a different way to provide the answers
you need.

--
Paul Barker
Konsulko Group


Recipies version of incoming October Gatesgarth release.

Yocto_user
 

Hi,
Is there any way to know all the recipes version detail that will come with Yocto 3.2 Gatesgarth ??