Chris Larson <clarson@...>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Wolfgang Denk <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
This is wrong. A compatibility break in bblayers.conf is *extremely* rare.By "better way to deal with these", what would you suggest? I don't see anyWell, the comment in "meta-yocto/conf/bblayers.conf.sample" says:
If such a change is allowed and is done intentionally, then it shouldWrong. The user has to know that they may need to change their
bblayers.conf to match the upstream structure. If it didn't complain,
they could silently break or encounter unexpected behavior.
The problem (and the longer I think about it the less I hesitate toNot everyone using oe-core (meta) also uses meta-yocto. Only those
using the latter were affected by this particular upstream structure
I understand the intention, but the current implementation is justAgain, that'd leave the user with a bblayers.conf that may no longer
do what they intended it to do. Better to fail than potentially build
in ways not matching the user's previous expectations.