On Aug 14, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Elvis Dowson <elvis.dowson@...> wrote:Yes, I tried gcc-4.5.1 and eglibc-2.16, it didn't work.and how about gcc 4.5 + eglibc 2.16 did you try that ?
The following combinations didn't work:
gcc-4.5.1, eglibc-2.15, binutils-2.22
gcc-4.5.1, eglibc-2.16, binutils-2.22
gcc-4.7.2, eglibc-2.13, binutils-2.22
The combinations that worked are
gcc-4.5.1, eglibc-2.13, binutils-2.22
gcc-4.6.3, eglibc-2.13, binutils-2.22 (from the Denx ELDK 5.2.1 release.)
I am going to re-verify with the current poky, meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer to ensure that it too builds and works, with gcc-4.6.3 and eglibc-2.13.
We can't narrow it down to one component because
gcc-4.7.1 + eglibc-2.13 doesnt work, and
gcc-4.5.1 + eglibc-2.15 & egblic-2.16 don't work.
We've got two variables here, that are causing a failure in dynamic linking (probably).