Re: nothing building under denzil-7.0.1
Jim Abernathy
On 07/21/2012 12:06 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
Next, I cloned poky and checked out the tag denzil-7.0.1, which in theory should match the tarball I ran with in the above test. I cloned meta-intel and checked out the branch denzil, just as above.
So this good news is that worked as expected. The denzil-7.0.1 tag equals the tarball.
So the only problem is the denzil branch of poky has some problem that's seen in denzil-7.0.1 as it relates to n450.
Jim A
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:55 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:I can confirm I had no issues doing just what you did. tarball for denzil-7.0.1 and denzil clone for meta-intel and default core-image-sato for n450.On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 15:39 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:Also did a fresh clone of meta-intel, checked out meta-intel/denzil andOn Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:35 -0400, Jim Abernathy wrote:As a sanity check, I just now downloaded the denzil-7.0.1 tarball andOn 07/20/2012 04:29 PM, Scott Garman wrote:I updated the n450 in both the denzil and master meta-intel branches,On 07/20/2012 01:11 PM, Jim Abernathy wrote:I think it maybe that old problem with the n450 SRCREC being blank inThere must be some basic thing I'm missing. Nothing that I used toHi Jim,
build under denzil 7.0 will now build under denzil 7.0.1 or tracking the
denzil branch. Are all the BSPs required to be updated to 7.0.1 before
you can run?
I'd thought I'd check before I post a bunch of log files.
I just downloaded the poky 7.0.1 tarball and cd'ed to that untarred
directory and untarred the 7.0 Intel BSPs.
There must be a step I'm missing. otherwise this would not have gotten
thru testing before deployment.
Jim A
We need more specific information about the error(s) you're seeing.
We've done extensive QA with 7.0.1 and meta-intel, so I imagine there
must be a step you've forgotten.
For example, you are using the denzil branch of meta-intel, right?
Scott
the linux-yocto bbappend file. Obviously that BSP didn't get fixed
before 7.0.1 was deployed. I'll put in the ones I used to patch in and
see if it works.
but the tarball still needs to be updated with that fix.
Is this the problem you're seeing, or are there other problems you're
seeing with this and/or the other meta-intel BSPs?
the denzil sugarbay tarball and built successfully without any problems.
successfully built n450 with the denzil-7.0.1 tarball here with no
problems.
Tom
Next, I cloned poky and checked out the tag denzil-7.0.1, which in theory should match the tarball I ran with in the above test. I cloned meta-intel and checked out the branch denzil, just as above.
So this good news is that worked as expected. The denzil-7.0.1 tag equals the tarball.
So the only problem is the denzil branch of poky has some problem that's seen in denzil-7.0.1 as it relates to n450.
Jim A
TomTomJim A_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@...
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
yocto mailing list
yocto@...
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto