Re: <rant>the current yocto FAQ is pretty much valueless</rant>
Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
So this situation might lend itself to a nice FAQ question....yes, but it would also need information on ordering of consultation. from bitbake.conf: require conf/abi_version.conf include conf/site.conf include conf/auto.conf include conf/local.conf include conf/build/${BUILD_SYS}.conf include conf/target/${TARGET_SYS}.conf include conf/machine/${MACHINE}.conf include conf/machine-sdk/${SDKMACHINE}.conf include conf/distro/${DISTRO}.conf include conf/distro/defaultsetup.conf include conf/documentation.conf require conf/sanity.conf is it safe to assume that the ordering there is important, and that files are consulted top down? if that's the case, it's useful to explain that the site.conf file would be consulted before one's local.conf file (if that's in fact the case). rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== |
|