Re: prerequisite tools for making documentation
Paul Eggleton
On Sunday 24 June 2012 12:06:14 jfabernathy wrote:
documentation into a separate list, since most people don't need to build the
documentation. That said, it would be nice if our documentation pre-requisites
list was actually complete, so if the list is split I'm all for it :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
I had a need to look at the bitbake manual in theIMO, we should be separating out the prerequisites for building the
poky/bitbake/doc/manual directory and tried to make pdf. I had all the
prerequisites listed in the QS guide. However, I found the make failed
due to a number of xml related tools being missing. I installed those
and got the pdf manual generated.
Should we add those xml tools to the prerequisites? BTW, I'm using
denzil branch and referring to the QS guide 1.2.
documentation into a separate list, since most people don't need to build the
documentation. That said, it would be nice if our documentation pre-requisites
list was actually complete, so if the list is split I'm all for it :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre