Re: Y2038 proposal

Alexander Kanavin

On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 10:40, Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...> wrote:

It would be even better if the meta-y2038 could be dropped and _all_
its functionality could be merged to poky.

That would be _awesome_.

Please just be aware that this meta layer has some fixes for some
packages (for Y2038 ready glibc).
Little by little. As long as we have a well-defined test plan, a
well-known list of issues, and follow a strict 'upstream first' policy
in addressing them (e.g. no fixes in layers that are 'forever
pending', un-upstreamable or have been rejected by upstreams), we'll
eventually get there.

And absolutely no promise to make this available anywhere except
master. If someone is using ancient yocto releases, they should run a
retro computing museum rather than critical infrastructure.


Join to automatically receive all group messages.