Re: Maintaining ABI Compatibility for LTS branch

Sinan Kaya <okaya@...>

On 2/9/2022 4:38 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
This probably does need a discussion on the architecture list and we need some
discussion and decisions about where/what buildhistory could/should do. Adding
this to buildhistory is all well and good but we don't have a meaningful
integration/monitoring of existing buildhistory issues in our
autobuilder/workflow today even before adding new things.
I was hoping for free cycles. I didn't get one. This will be an intern

The way I'm thinking is to have the ABI compat XML be part of the state
cache tgz file and come up with a CVE check kind of hook maybe called
"ABI check" that will start flagging problems.

Would this be a better architecture?

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.