Re: Maintaining ABI Compatibility for LTS branch
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...>
On 2/9/2022 11:42 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
There are two reasons people are interested:What would be the minimum acceptable solution with the least investment?
in other words, do we have a list of requirements?
Our team has posted a solution. BMW folks posted a solution.
None of them got merged.
Could we take the version from BMW folks, merge and have the next person
add new features where it doesn't satisfy requirements?
or vice versa? or as Ross said some other work?
or none of the solutions are acceptable?