Re: Question of Yocto dunfell LTS period
Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 07:14 +0000, Matthias Klein wrote:
years to 4 years. There should have been some announcements about this but we
lack people on the advocacy side of the project with time to make that happen.
That saddens me a lot and I think it is a missed opportunity but there isn't
much I can do about it beyond what I've already tried.
Extending Dunfell is an experiment so we would base a decision on how well the
dunfell extension is working out. Extending an LTS like this requires a
financial commitment from the project. At this point in time the project cannot
commit to extending kirkstone as we can't guarantee the finances.
Cheers,
Richard
Hello together,The project members agreed to fun an extension to the lifetime of dunfell from 2
I would like to add a question to the topic:
Why was the LTS period for dunfell extended?
Can we expect the same for kirstone?
years to 4 years. There should have been some announcements about this but we
lack people on the advocacy side of the project with time to make that happen.
That saddens me a lot and I think it is a missed opportunity but there isn't
much I can do about it beyond what I've already tried.
Extending Dunfell is an experiment so we would base a decision on how well the
dunfell extension is working out. Extending an LTS like this requires a
financial commitment from the project. At this point in time the project cannot
commit to extending kirkstone as we can't guarantee the finances.
Cheers,
Richard