Hi Richard,

Thanks for the review!

On 11/24/21 7:10 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:

On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 18:16 +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:

Together with the corresponding Bitbake version, which are no
longer supported.

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...>
---
scripts/run-docs-build | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/run-docs-build b/scripts/run-docs-build
index 3db4a97..5e1d649 100755
--- a/scripts/run-docs-build
+++ b/scripts/run-docs-build
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ mkdir $outputdir/bitbake/next
cp -r ./_build/final/* $outputdir/bitbake/next

# stable branches
-for branch in 1.46 1.48 1.50 1.52; do
+for branch in 1.46 1.50 1.52; do
git checkout $branch
make clean
make publish
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ mkdir $outputdir/next
cp -r ./_build/final/* $outputdir/next

# stable branches
-for branch in dunfell gatesgarth hardknott honister; do
+for branch in dunfell hardknott honister; do
cd $ypdocs
git checkout $branch
make clean

I'm a bit torn on this. They are no longer officially supported releases now but
it may make sense to rebuild all the sphinx docs in this script rather than some
subset?

I understand. Your decision to make.
I just proposed this change for consistency with the current implementation.

Any other opinions?

Cheers
Michael.

--
Michael Opdenacker, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com