Hi all, hi Khem,
Am Do, 19. Aug 2021, um 00:22, schrieb Khem Raj:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:06 PM Manuel Wagesreither <ManWag@fastmail.fm> wrote:Okay, so if I get things right then IMAGE_FEATURES+="x11" is under the hood nothing more than an IMAGE_INSTALL+="packagegroup-core-x11". Is that right? If so, what's the purpose of adding the concept of IMAGE_FEATURE? I mean, it doesn't make things SO much easier. Setting an IMAGE_FEATURE or an IMAGE_INSTALL variable is the same to me.x11-* features is primarily to control what kind of x11 packages you
you should really is looking at DISTRO_FEATURES e.g. wayland distroYepp, I know. I left them out on purpose because I was mainly interested in where the configuration for X11 and wayland differs conceptually. With "conceptually" I mean that one is added through IMAGE_FEATURES while the other is through IMAGE_INSTALL.
And if there would be more wayland based compositors or images then you would turn extract this into an IMAGE_FEATURE as well? Why? How does that make things easier? Again, I feel there's something to IMAGE_FEATURES I didn't yet understand.* Theory: Is IMAGE_FEATURE +=x11 manipulating IMAGE_INSTALL under the hood so you don't have to do it manually? And as there is no IMAGE_FEATURE "wayland", you have do it manually. Correct?there are not many wayland based compositors or images we have in core
Thanks for the explanation on MACHINE_HWCODEC. I'm curious, so is core-image-x11 require DISTRO_FEATURE hwcodec or not? If yes, than it seems to be missing in the core-image-x11.bb (it's in the core-images-weston.bb, after all), if no, then why is it not required for X11?* Why does core-image-weston.bb need to enable IMAGE_FEATURE hwcodec, while core-image-x11.bb does not? (Dunfell branch.)openGL is needed for wayland/weston to work too but hwcodec feature is
I know I'm asking quite detailed questions, but I got the feeling I need to understand this once and for all.
Thanks, regards, Manuel