The target system should be independent of buildtools version and the target
system should also be binary reproducible so if that were changing through
changing buildtools tarball, that would be worrying in itself.
Even better, the rootfs built by YOCTO could be used, but anyone can
build U-Boot and kernel outside of the YOCTO, using their own cross
compilers (I use Fedora 33 ARM cross compilers, since my Linux host is
Fedora 33).
Then to install all the different components on the SDcard for the
target system.
And see if the issue repeats itself...
Zee
_______
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 2:49 PM Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 21:48 -0700, Chuck Wolber wrote:
All,
Please accept my apologies in advance for the detailed submission. I think
it is warranted in this case.
There is something... "odd" about the GCC 10 compiler that is delivered with
Hardknott. I am still chasing it down, so I am not yet ready to declare a
root cause or submit a bug, but I am posting what I have now in case anyone
has some insights to offer.
The issue you describe does sound strange. I was a little unclear about exactly
which combinations were passing/failing. Are you saying that some versions of
buildtools let the system work but some do not? We now have gcc 11 in master
so it would be interesting to know how things worked there and if any
regression was fixed.
I have also heard reports of issues with bison segfaulting from other sources
but I don't have anything I can point to specifically about it.
The target system should be independent of buildtools version and the target
system should also be binary reproducible so if that were changing through
changing buildtools tarball, that would be worrying in itself.
P.P.S. For the sake of completeness, I had to add the following files to the buildtools-extended
sysroot to fully complete the build of our images:
/usr/include/magic.h -> util-linux "more" command requires this.
/usr/include/zstd.h -> I do not recall which recipe required this.
/usr/bin/free -> The OpenJDK 8 build scripts need this.
/usr/include/sys/* -> openjdk-8-native
/lib/libcap.so.2 -> The binutils "dir" command quietly breaks the build without this. I am not a fan of the
lack of error checking in the binutils build...
/usr/include/sensors/error.h and sensors.h -> mesa-native
/usr/include/zstd_errors.h -> qemu-system-native
It is great to have this list, outside the non-jdk issues are probably issues we
should look at fixing in OE-Core. Do you mean binutils above for the dir command?
Cheers,