On 3/10/21 2:31 AM, Ming Liu wrote:
I saw this patch set has been merged to gatesgarth, may I ask, any
plan for dunfell? I am asking because dunfell is a LTS branch and many
users are building their products based on it. Thanks!
that are being built current. I can on build on branch at a time and it
takes time to do each. Things are looking good so I suspect they
changes will land in the next day or so.
series in build testing
On 3/2/21 6:57 AM, liu.ming50@...
> From: Ming Liu <ming.liu@... <mailto:ming.liu@...>>
> Cherry pick some IMA/EVM fixes to LTS dunfell branch, with these
> patches applied, I could run a ima enabled image with
> on qemuarm/qemuarm64 and some NXP machines.
> Ming Liu (9):
> ima-evm-utils: set native REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES to empty
> initramfs-framework-ima: fix a wrong path
> ima-evm-keys: add recipe
> initramfs-framework-ima: RDEPENDS on ima-evm-keys
> meta: refactor IMA/EVM sign rootfs
> README.md: update according to the refactoring in
> initramfs-framework-ima: let ima_enabled return 0
> ima-evm-rootfs.bbclass: avoid generating /etc/fstab for wic
> ima-policy-hashed: add CGROUP2_SUPER_MAGIC fsmagic
> meta-integrity/README.md | 4 ++-
> meta-integrity/classes/ima-evm-rootfs.bbclass | 33
<http://initramfs-framework-ima.bb> | 2 +-
> .../initrdscripts/initramfs-framework-ima/ima | 3 +-
<http://ima-evm-keys_1.0.bb> | 16 +++++++++
<http://ima-evm-utils_git.bb> | 1 +
> .../ima_policy_hashed/files/ima_policy_hashed | 3 ++
> 7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644