perhaps you should create a new branch for this layer which will be
compatible with gatesgarth, you can seed it with dunfell branch
and then make needed changes
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:02 PM Jonas Vautherin
I am using Yocto Gatesgarth, and I was just updating a layer that was written for Dunfell. In the `conf/layer.conf`, I can simply add "gatesgarth" to `LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_pocketbeagle`, like so:
LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_pocketbeagle = "dunfell gatesgarth"
However, this does not seem to work for a `.bbappend`. Let me use this particular layer as an example: it is a BSP that defines `linux-yocto_4.19.bbappend` for Dunfell. In my case, I want to define `linux-yocto_5.4.bbappend` for Gatesgarth. When building with Dunfell, I would like it to use the former, and when building with Gatesgarth, I would like it to use the latter.
However, if I keep both `linux-yocto_4.19.bbappend` and `linux-yocto_5.4.bbappend` and try to build with Gatesgarth, it fails with:
ERROR: No recipes in default available for:
Which makes sense: Gatesgarth does not provide `linux-yocto_4.19`.
Is there a way to keep both `*.bbappend` and have Yocto ignore the ones that do not correspond to its version? Or would that be bad practice anyway?