Re: what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?

Robert P. J. Day

On Wed, 13 May 2020, Quentin Schulz wrote:

... snip ...

If it's really widely used, maybe something to add to
openembedded-core/files/common-licenses/ ? So that you don't need
any of the suggested ways?
that was one of the first things that came to mind ... if there are
enough packages with this license, why not just make it official? i
just did a quick search, and this is the only layer i see that makes
reference to it:


* Copyright (C) 2017 Denys Vlasenko
* Licensed under GPLv2, see file LICENSE in this source tree.

/* This AES implementation is derived from tiny-AES128-C code,
* which was put by its author into public domain:
* tiny-AES128-C/unlicense.txt, Dec 8, 2014
* """
* This is free and unencumbered software released into the public domain.

more info on that license:

open to suggestions.


Join to automatically receive all group messages.