Re: QA Cycle report for build (yocto-3.0.2.rc2)


Sangeeta Jain
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mittal, Anuj <anuj.mittal@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, 20 February, 2020 11:35 AM
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>; akuster808
<akuster808@gmail.com>; Jain, Sangeeta <sangeeta.jain@intel.com>;
yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org
Cc: otavio@ossystems.com.br; yi.zhao@windriver.com; Sangal, Apoorv
<apoorv.sangal@intel.com>; Yeoh, Ee Peng <ee.peng.yeoh@intel.com>; Chan,
Aaron Chun Yew <aaron.chun.yew.chan@intel.com>; sjolley.yp.pm@gmail.com;
Tummalapalli, Vineela <vineela.tummalapalli@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [yocto] QA Cycle report for build (yocto-3.0.2.rc2)

On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 14:41 -0800, akuster808 wrote:

On 2/18/20 11:33 PM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote:
Hi All,

This is the full report for yocto-3.0.2.rc2:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contr
ib
/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults

======= Summary ========
No high milestone defects.
one new defects are found in this cycle - oeqa/runtime test
'test_dnf_exclude' failed (Bugid:13797) openssh ptest failed (BUG
id:13796) bash ptest failed (BUG id:13795)

======= Bugs ========
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797
From the error log, it looks like we are trying to install 7.67 while zeus has 7.66
so it errors out. I am guessing that curl wasn't built in a clean build directory so
the correct version of curl is deployed. Can this test be re-run please?
Re-run the test in new build directory and after having 'bitbake curl'.
It is passing now. Updating bug in Bugzila.


https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13796
This needs:

https://github.com/openssh/openssh-
portable/commit/ff31f15773ee173502eec4d7861ec56f26bba381

https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795
Was because of the bash CVE patch.


Thank you for logging the defects.

I suspect this in now in the hands of the YP TSC.
What is the stable maintainer's thoughts on this?

In particular I'm worried about the bash patch and whether the ptest
regression above is related to that or not? Any recommendation?
Looks like it's related but I don't think the impact is much. The test is failing
because the line number that is expected to fail changed (because of the lines
being added in the test). So we should be okay in my opinion.

Thanks,

Anuj

Join yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org to automatically receive all group messages.