Re: QA Cycle report for build (yocto-3.0.2.rc2)


Anuj Mittal
 

On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 14:41 -0800, akuster808 wrote:

On 2/18/20 11:33 PM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote:
Hi All,

This is the full report for yocto-3.0.2.rc2:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib
/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults

======= Summary ========
No high milestone defects.
one new defects are found in this cycle - oeqa/runtime test
'test_dnf_exclude' failed (Bugid:13797) openssh ptest failed (BUG
id:13796) bash ptest failed (BUG id:13795)

======= Bugs ========
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797
From the error log, it looks like we are trying to install 7.67 while zeus has 7.66 so it errors out. I am guessing that curl wasn't built in a clean build directory so the correct version of curl is deployed. Can this test be re-run please?

https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13796
This needs:

https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/ff31f15773ee173502eec4d7861ec56f26bba381

https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795
Was because of the bash CVE patch.


Thank you for logging the defects.

I suspect this in now in the hands of the YP TSC.
What is the stable maintainer's thoughts on this?

In particular I'm worried about the bash patch and whether the ptest regression above
is related to that or not? Any recommendation?
Looks like it's related but I don't think the impact is much. The test is failing because the line number that is expected to fail changed (because of the lines being added in the test). So we should be okay in my opinion.

Thanks,

Anuj

Join yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org to automatically receive all group messages.