Re: Missing layer in the layer index


On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, at 10:07, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday, 5 December 2019 9:48:48 PM NZDT Paul Barker wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, at 01:37, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 December 2019 11:10:49 PM NZDT Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
I'd like to make sure meta-sancloud (> > sancloud) is listed in the layer index. I can't see it listed for either
of the branches we support (thud & rocko). However, when I try to add the
layer I get the error message "Layer with this Layer name already exists."

Perhaps this was already added with an old URL. Is there any way to get
this fixed up?
yes, this is the reason. It exists with the following URL:

The maintainer for that layer is not listed.. was it you?
Oddly there are no maintainer records and no layer branch records either,
hence why the layer doesn't show up properly. I'm unsure how it would have got
into that state or how long it's been there, but since it's pretty much
useless I have gone ahead and deleted it - Paul, could you please file your
submission again?
Thanks for that, it may have got broken in the layer index when we moved the repo from our private Bitbucket instance over to GitHub. I've resubmitted now.
Actually looking at the new repo I think I know what might have
happened. The layer index does not currently handle layers that don't
have a master branch perfectly; it could be that the original repo went
away and that caused it to remove all the layerbranches, and since
maintainers are per layerbranch they also got removed. (If a master
layerbranch is there it is protected from deletion even if upstream
master goes away, you just get a warning during parsing.)

I can understand why people don't want to have a master branch if they
aren't using it; that most layers have it was an assumption I made in
the earlier design. It's fixable but will take a bit of work to ensure
the correct behaviour. (This assumption is also reflected in the
submission process - by default a master layerbranch is created, but
for layers without a master branch as the approver you then have to go
in and switch the master branch to whatever the "main" branch is - I
just did that for this layer.)
Ah ok. I have a pet hate of layers with a master branch that doesn't actually work with master of oe-core and other layers. I'd rather see a repository with no master branch!

In this case we're building with meta-ti & meta-arago which only support every other release. I know they also have a master branch but it's always been broken when I've tried to use it in the past. I may see if I can give it another try.

Paul Barker

Join to automatically receive all group messages.