is there a rationale for YP using sysvinit as default init manager?
Robert P. J. Day
don't get me wrong, i have no problem with that, but a colleague
asked me what the reason was for using sysvinit as the *default*. i hemmed and hawed and suggested it was for simplicity and reliability, and that a lot of embedded systems didn't need the flashy features of systemd, and so on. is there any short answer to give to that question? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== |
|