Re: [PATCH] poky: LICENSE in packagegroup makes no sense - removed


Burton, Ross <ross.burton@...>
 

On 30 October 2017 at 16:02, Khem Raj <raj.khem@...> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Robert Berger
<yocto.user.mailinglist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Berger <robert.berger@ReliableEmbeddedSystems.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb
> b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb
> index 2ca6392..aee4a03 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb
> @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
>   SUMMARY = "Host packages for the standalone SDK or external toolchain"
>  PR = "r12"
> -LICENSE = "MIT"

this might fail some QA checks. what issues do you see with this in.


The commit message is misleading: it doesn't make no sense as every recipe needs a LICENSE assignment, but the packagegroup class sets a default value.

Robert, please rephrase the message, fix the formatting ('nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: remove redundant LICENSE' is a reasonable shortlog), and post to the correct list.

Ross

Join yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org to automatically receive all group messages.