On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...> wrote:

 (yes, i *am* going to be this pedantic all day long. at least until
football starts.)

over at
http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-1.1/toolchain/,
a couple optional fixups:

1) the toolchain ...i686-x86_64... doesn't appear to belong under the
x86-64 directory.  (it *does* live properly under the i686 directory.)

2) the directory name is "x86-64" while all the toolchain tarball
names contain "x86_64".  any reason why these can't be consistent?
what's the standard?  it just seems confusing to keep bouncing back
and forth.

since x86_64 (which is more familiar) has an 'underscore' in it and
bitbake reserved that
for overrides we had a potential conflict here thats why alternate
name x86-64 is used
actually they both mean the same thing.

rday

--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                       http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@...
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto