Bodke, Kishore K <kishore.k.bodke@...>
Hi Darren,
With the below Tom's commit IDs, the build was success and I am moving ahead with this. I am not blocked. I was also able to build and boot the Crystalforest BSP.
Thanks Kishore.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@...] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:42 AM To: Bodke, Kishore K Cc: yocto@... Subject: Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 09/01/2011 03:05 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not showing up here.
bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "IMAGE_INSTALL=" # MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL= # IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL} IMAGE_INSTALL="task-core-boot task-base-extended"
I will rebuild with rttests and send the output. Hi Kishore, Where are you with this? Are you unblocked and moving ahead? Thanks, Darren Thanks Kishore.
-----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@...] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM To: Bodke, Kishore K Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@...; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
Can you report the output of:
$ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL="
Thanks,
Darren
On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds. Thanks Kishore.
-----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@...] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM To: Bodke, Kishore K Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@...; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.
It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
-- Darren
Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@...] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; yocto@...; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it fails for the do_rootfs .
FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel:
Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
using the following commits:
poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you?
I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if I can reproduce the issue.
Thanks,
Darren
Tom
Attached is the build log.
Could you please let me know what went wrong?
Thanks
Kishore.
-- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
|