Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay


Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
 

On 09/01/2011 03:05 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not showing up here.

bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "IMAGE_INSTALL="
# MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL=
# IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL}
IMAGE_INSTALL="task-core-boot task-base-extended"

I will rebuild with rttests and send the output.
Hi Kishore,

Where are you with this? Are you unblocked and moving ahead?

Thanks,

Darren


Thanks
Kishore.

-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@...]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@...; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay

Can you report the output of:

$ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL="

Thanks,

Darren

On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds.
Thanks
Kishore.

-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@...]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@...; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay

On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.

It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests"
Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...

--
Darren


Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart
[mailto:dvhart@...] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
yocto@...; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay



On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:

On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,



I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
and it fails for the do_rootfs .
FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
kernel:

Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux

using the following commits:

poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea

Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
you?

I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
if I can reproduce the issue.

Thanks,

Darren

Tom



Attached is the build log.



Could you please let me know what went wrong?



Thanks

Kishore.

--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel

Join {yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org to automatically receive all group messages.