Re: BSP in meta layer vs poky
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:23 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
I was wondering what distinction qualified for a BSP existing in aThe original criteria for what we included was:
* One board per architecture
* Should be available to a general developer in a relatively cost
effective manner (sub $1000?)
* Lets us test functionality of the architecture
Trying to find a PPC board we could easily obtain was quite tricky. We
stuck to one board per architecture for fairness reasons and also
resources since the Yocto project isn't resourced to maintain BSPs.
We're definitely open to discussions about changes there but it does
need to be a high level discussion, likely at the advisory board level.
Note that some of Yocto's developers and the QA team have those
reference board for test purposes so if we do change we'd need to update