Re: Additional / new BSP collection?
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 06:53 -0700, Kumar Gala wrote:
has too (no messages in it). It's also not linked to from anywhere on
the Yocto site that I can see e.g. Community | Mailing Lists.
Personally I'd prefer less fragmentation of lists, and think it would
get better review and exposure on the yocto list, but if it makes more
sense to people to start using the yocto-bsp list, fine with me...
Tom
On Jul 27, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:Hmm, I completely forgot about that list, and apparently everybody elseHi Kumar,Ok, same model would work for meta-fsl-ppc. The one question I have is if it make sense to migrate such patches over to 'yocto-bsp@...' list.
For meta-intel, it's pretty simple and is summarized by this blurb from
the meta-intel MAINTAINERS file:
"Please submit any patches against meta-intel BSPs to the Yocto mailing
list (yocto@...)."
Basically, new patches get submitted to the mailing list, go through the
standard on-list comment and review process, and then get pulled into
master by whoever maintains the BSP when everything looks good.
Hope that helps,
Tom
has too (no messages in it). It's also not linked to from anywhere on
the Yocto site that I can see e.g. Community | Mailing Lists.
Personally I'd prefer less fragmentation of lists, and think it would
get better review and exposure on the yocto list, but if it makes more
sense to people to start using the yocto-bsp list, fine with me...
Tom
- k