On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 17:57 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Yes, I'm just talking about libav 0.8 here - libav 9 would remain where it is. That might still be problematic though given that their PN is the same. I'm open to better suggestions, but I think we have to do *something* here.
We could put a PROVIDES += "xxx" into one of the libavs and then DEPENDS on that in the corresponding recipes...
