On Thursday 08 May 2014 19:21:44 Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:57:54PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 08 May 2014 18:19:08 Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:07:19PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 08 May 2014 15:48:40 Burton, Ross wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience.
For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to GStreamer 1.x. GStreamer 0.10 is considered dead upstream and is unmaintained so we don't need to be shipping both versions anymore.
Everyone in agreement? Should I expect any hate mail over this?
+1
The next question is does that mean for the "old" libav (which gst-ffmpeg depends upon), do we move that as well or drop it?
libav was migrated to oe-core quite recently and there is couple of recipes in meta-oe, meta-webserver depending on it/ffmpeg so moving to meta-multimedia wouldn't be very easy.
But I would like to see migration to libav-9 which currently has negative D_P (mplayer2 already depends on 9*, but there are few recipes which fails with libav-9 too - see earlier world builds for list).
Yes, I'm just talking about libav 0.8 here - libav 9 would remain where it is. That might still be problematic though given that their PN is the same. I'm open to better suggestions, but I think we have to do *something* here.
Ah ok, I though you meant both versions.
Then I would rather drop 0.8 completely, otherwise it will be preferred even with negative D_P from meta-multimedia (YOCTO #2964) and we cannot expect people which happen to have meta-multimedia layer to know that they are expected to update P_V everytime libav is updated in oe-core.
Hmm. Perhaps a less intrusive solution then would be to create a completely separate meta-gstreamer0.10 layer for those that still really need it rather than putting it in meta-multimedia?