On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Darren Hart wrote:

On 07/13/2011 03:48 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:

On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 06:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

just perusing the documentation in my typically pedantic fashion and
a couple questions about style. first, is the proper spelling
"Bitbake" or "BitBake" since the doc source seems to bounce back and
forth and it really should be consistent.

I believe it's the latter, at least that's what I've always use.

Agreed:

The man page:
BitBake - simple tool for the execution of tasks

The user manual:
BitBake User Manual

Those seem like the two lines of documentation that are most likely to
be correct :-) So unless Richard or Chris pipe up, I'd go with BitBake.

i thought as much, i'm going with that. not high on any list of
priorities but while i'm perusing the docs, i might as well make notes
of what can change, and submit patches for the more obvious stuff.

are the small changes i've posted here in acceptable format? do
they get ACKed at some point so i can verify they were accepted?

rday

--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================